Yeah, this is something the CDC's been talking about for several years now. They've got genetic studies that they're doing as well with the intent of getting a broad survey of how environmental and genetic factors impact various diseases. It's a huge program.
NHANES is just a part of it. This survey, while extensive, is harmless. It's just a very extensive data collection effort intended to try and narrow down what are called social determinants of health. In countless diseases, it is well documented that "environmental factors" are major risk factors. For example, asbestos exposure among workers at old naval yards leading to lung cancer. A large part of the survey is an assessment of various potential hazards, and the data promises to offer a window into understanding the increased rates of atopic diseases, asthma, autoimmune diseases, autism spectrum disorder, ADHD, and other mental health disorders, and of course cancer.
Regarding "targeted communities": Yes, the survey specifically targets rural areas. It is very easy to recruit people in major cities. Researchers have ready access to populations that are commonly willing to participate in testing and research, like young healthy college students. It creates an intrinsic bias in the data towards white, affluent people and whatever the local minority is. In order to get a representative sample, you have to go out into communities that are not common sources for survey/study recruitment and make a deliberate effort to sample these areas. Rural America is a "target" for this type of effort. There's nothing nefarious about it. It's an effort to get accurate, generalizable data.
Regarding money: it is not uncommon to offer money when the testing or surveys are known to take several hours. While wealthy people may agree to do it for free, poor people often see that as time they could be working for a wage, and so if you want a representative sample, you have to pay everyone for their time in order to avoid a sampling bias.
Regarding asking about guns: This is Obama-era bullshit and it is exactly what it sounds like. It is an effort to create the narrative that gun ownership is linked with disease or poor health in some way. This is intended to justify leftist narratives about mentally unstable people owning guns and representing a danger to society. They actually teach this bullshit to doctors in medical schools now as formal parts of the curriculum required to get a school accredited. As we've already seen with the push on red flag laws, the goal here is to find an excuse to seize guns.
$150? Cash? In the trailer? Presumably for hundreds of people? Hold on, let me go get something, and I'll go back to the trailer with you, for "testing".
Anyone asking you to jump in their trailer for some cold cash should be an automatic red flag right there. People have to be pretty desperate and hard up for money to fall into this trap..
Yeah, this is something the CDC's been talking about for several years now. They've got genetic studies that they're doing as well with the intent of getting a broad survey of how environmental and genetic factors impact various diseases. It's a huge program.
NHANES is just a part of it. This survey, while extensive, is harmless. It's just a very extensive data collection effort intended to try and narrow down what are called social determinants of health. In countless diseases, it is well documented that "environmental factors" are major risk factors. For example, asbestos exposure among workers at old naval yards leading to lung cancer. A large part of the survey is an assessment of various potential hazards, and the data promises to offer a window into understanding the increased rates of atopic diseases, asthma, autoimmune diseases, autism spectrum disorder, ADHD, and other mental health disorders, and of course cancer.
Regarding "targeted communities": Yes, the survey specifically targets rural areas. It is very easy to recruit people in major cities. Researchers have ready access to populations that are commonly willing to participate in testing and research, like young healthy college students. It creates an intrinsic bias in the data towards white, affluent people and whatever the local minority is. In order to get a representative sample, you have to go out into communities that are not common sources for survey/study recruitment and make a deliberate effort to sample these areas. Rural America is a "target" for this type of effort. There's nothing nefarious about it. It's an effort to get accurate, generalizable data.
Regarding money: it is not uncommon to offer money when the testing or surveys are known to take several hours. While wealthy people may agree to do it for free, poor people often see that as time they could be working for a wage, and so if you want a representative sample, you have to pay everyone for their time in order to avoid a sampling bias.
Regarding asking about guns: This is Obama-era bullshit and it is exactly what it sounds like. It is an effort to create the narrative that gun ownership is linked with disease or poor health in some way. This is intended to justify leftist narratives about mentally unstable people owning guns and representing a danger to society. They actually teach this bullshit to doctors in medical schools now as formal parts of the curriculum required to get a school accredited. As we've already seen with the push on red flag laws, the goal here is to find an excuse to seize guns.
"I don't want your test, and I'm going to buy another gun when this interview is over."
"Well, you're testing me by asking me this right now and my stance on guns is about 500 yards with good visibility."
Trespass again and find out my stance on guns
Yeah, this is something the CDC's been talking about for several years now. They've got genetic studies that they're doing as well with the intent of getting a broad survey of how environmental and genetic factors impact various diseases. It's a huge program.
NHANES is just a part of it. This survey, while extensive, is harmless. It's just a very extensive data collection effort intended to try and narrow down what are called social determinants of health. In countless diseases, it is well documented that "environmental factors" are major risk factors. For example, asbestos exposure among workers at old naval yards leading to lung cancer. A large part of the survey is an assessment of various potential hazards, and the data promises to offer a window into understanding the increased rates of atopic diseases, asthma, autoimmune diseases, autism spectrum disorder, ADHD, and other mental health disorders, and of course cancer.
Regarding "targeted communities": Yes, the survey specifically targets rural areas. It is very easy to recruit people in major cities. Researchers have ready access to populations that are commonly willing to participate in testing and research, like young healthy college students. It creates an intrinsic bias in the data towards white, affluent people and whatever the local minority is. In order to get a representative sample, you have to go out into communities that are not common sources for survey/study recruitment and make a deliberate effort to sample these areas. Rural America is a "target" for this type of effort. There's nothing nefarious about it. It's an effort to get accurate, generalizable data.
Regarding money: it is not uncommon to offer money when the testing or surveys are known to take several hours. While wealthy people may agree to do it for free, poor people often see that as time they could be working for a wage, and so if you want a representative sample, you have to pay everyone for their time in order to avoid a sampling bias.
Regarding asking about guns: This is Obama-era bullshit and it is exactly what it sounds like. It is an effort to create the narrative that gun ownership is linked with disease or poor health in some way. This is intended to justify leftist narratives about mentally unstable people owning guns and representing a danger to society. They actually teach this bullshit to doctors in medical schools now as formal parts of the curriculum required to get a school accredited. As we've already seen with the push on red flag laws, the goal here is to find an excuse to seize guns.
Harmless from the CDC? They'd get absolutely nothing from me, ever. Awake and aware people should tell them to eff off.
Are they going to ask people about their vaccination history, where many of these diseases come from?
I wouldn't answer a single question much less let those fucks run tests.
$150? Cash? In the trailer? Presumably for hundreds of people? Hold on, let me go get something, and I'll go back to the trailer with you, for "testing".
Anyone asking you to jump in their trailer for some cold cash should be an automatic red flag right there. People have to be pretty desperate and hard up for money to fall into this trap..
THERE was a Q Post: 4966 Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6
Line 1: WHAT IS CODED IN YOUR DNA? Line 10: There is a war for your DNA. Line 11: Protect your DNA.
WOWZA!!!
What so you think it means when it says "who put it there?"
OUR CREATOR!!!
Yeah but we know He made the DNA sequence, so why would we also say "who put this there" as if it doesn't belong?
something else?
They will get gun opinions up close if all the joggers find out they have that cash.
Guess they figured out unvaxed rednecks will survive.
Must have been what Hank Jr meant when he wrote a country boy can survive.
It's happening in rural Saskatchewan, too. Very creepy.
https://www.tiktok.com/@introverts008/video/7209401795179810053
Stay away! Tests can infect or damage too. Do not trust anyone who hets a paycheck from government. That goes double if they are in a uniform.
it's obviously a trap, why are these people being so nice to these "surveyists?" they're trying to kill them.
While the quote only somewhat applies, what is happening here is very suspicious. Never trust the government.
The Russians accused them of collecting DNA for targeted bioweapons.
Odd. Canada is reporting the same exact thing.
This sounds like BS to me.
Someone posted the source. Looks like a real program.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/participant/participant-selected.htm
And it looks like they're testing Vitamin D levels as well as heavy metal exposure.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/participant/information-collected.htm
Possibly so they know where to target their poisons?
Geezzz! They are being so obvious about it. I can only hope it's part of the show.
We're at war, it's messy.
They have to know how their efforts are going to decimate our vitamin D levels and fill us full of heavy metals.
Holy smokes.. i hadn't thought of that.. cripes.. still hard to wrap my mind around how morally bankrupt these people are.
Something to watch for .. for sure. Think we will be able to view the results in case there is a subsequent "incident"?
Why in the fu*k would anybody even take a test? People will know when they have picked up the Bioweapon Virus.
I got a bunch of very pushy voice messages a couple weeks ago from the CDC about vaccines. There is some massive information-gathering occurring.
I don't check my voicemail and I don't answer my phone unless your number's already programmed into it.
Id reply 150$ isn’t enough to buy my first one. Always counter offer. You want my dna that will be 1.5 million (even that’s too cheap)
If my driveway was a mile long they would know my stance on guns when they see the no trespassing signs.
Oh he-double hockey sticks NO NO NO!!
Wouldn't this be the kind of trick that aliens would use?
Yeah, this is something the CDC's been talking about for several years now. They've got genetic studies that they're doing as well with the intent of getting a broad survey of how environmental and genetic factors impact various diseases. It's a huge program.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/participant.htm
NHANES is just a part of it. This survey, while extensive, is harmless. It's just a very extensive data collection effort intended to try and narrow down what are called social determinants of health. In countless diseases, it is well documented that "environmental factors" are major risk factors. For example, asbestos exposure among workers at old naval yards leading to lung cancer. A large part of the survey is an assessment of various potential hazards, and the data promises to offer a window into understanding the increased rates of atopic diseases, asthma, autoimmune diseases, autism spectrum disorder, ADHD, and other mental health disorders, and of course cancer.
Regarding "targeted communities": Yes, the survey specifically targets rural areas. It is very easy to recruit people in major cities. Researchers have ready access to populations that are commonly willing to participate in testing and research, like young healthy college students. It creates an intrinsic bias in the data towards white, affluent people and whatever the local minority is. In order to get a representative sample, you have to go out into communities that are not common sources for survey/study recruitment and make a deliberate effort to sample these areas. Rural America is a "target" for this type of effort. There's nothing nefarious about it. It's an effort to get accurate, generalizable data.
Regarding money: it is not uncommon to offer money when the testing or surveys are known to take several hours. While wealthy people may agree to do it for free, poor people often see that as time they could be working for a wage, and so if you want a representative sample, you have to pay everyone for their time in order to avoid a sampling bias.
Regarding asking about guns: This is Obama-era bullshit and it is exactly what it sounds like. It is an effort to create the narrative that gun ownership is linked with disease or poor health in some way. This is intended to justify leftist narratives about mentally unstable people owning guns and representing a danger to society. They actually teach this bullshit to doctors in medical schools now as formal parts of the curriculum required to get a school accredited. As we've already seen with the push on red flag laws, the goal here is to find an excuse to seize guns.
Nothing nefarious at all. The CDC is truly trustworthy and will not do anything harmful with your DNA samples.
GTFOH with that nonsense.