While the news isn't brand-spanking new, there are open threads hanging from them and are still open cases. The articles on the site are indeed 'current' articles as they were written last month. So the answer is yes, current articles unless one only consider MSM musings to be news, current or otherwise.
May I suggest you make a post connecting whatever is happening now to whatever it is you think the connection is to Flynn/Linn drama? That would indeed be quite useful. I am at my wits end trying to figure out what Flynn/Linn drama has to do with anything going on right now, esp SDNY.
This is ridiculous if true and you should be embarrassed to say it
Why would I be embarassed to say I don't know what I don't know? How else do you hope to learn the truth if you are too embarassed to say you don't know something?
Is this how you approach your learning? By hiding what you don't know? That might explain a few things.
My guess is, you got nothing to backup your claims that Flynn/Linn drama has anything to do with the events right now and instead of just accepting it you have started doubling and tripling down and making strange attacks.
Remember, when I first asked that question it was simply to clarify. Your extreme responses to that simple question has to be addressed eventually.
While the news isn't brand-spanking new, there are open threads hanging from them and are still open cases. The articles on the site are indeed 'current' articles as they were written last month. So the answer is yes, current articles unless one only consider MSM musings to be news, current or otherwise.
May I suggest you make a post connecting whatever is happening now to whatever it is you think the connection is to Flynn/Linn drama? That would indeed be quite useful. I am at my wits end trying to figure out what Flynn/Linn drama has to do with anything going on right now, esp SDNY.
You're at your wits end trying to figure out what the Flynn/Linn drama has to do with anything right now.
This is ridiculous if true and you should be embarrassed to say it.
Why would I be embarassed to say I don't know what I don't know? How else do you hope to learn the truth if you are too embarassed to say you don't know something?
Is this how you approach your learning? By hiding what you don't know? That might explain a few things.
My guess is, you got nothing to backup your claims that Flynn/Linn drama has anything to do with the events right now and instead of just accepting it you have started doubling and tripling down and making strange attacks.
Remember, when I first asked that question it was simply to clarify. Your extreme responses to that simple question has to be addressed eventually.