Yup. I think there was a Q post that once hinted that deepfakes were also meant to do the very same thing.
Even if you show what they did they'll claim it was fake.
However, this can also be used against them. After all they have likely been using fake footage and pictures for a while to push narratives. If people didn't know the above image was absurd it looks fairly close to believable.
How many events and images did they "fake" and use for actual narratives?
By forcing them to expose how easily video and pictures can be faked (in order to prevent their crimes from being exposed) they're also exposing just how easy it is to fake news stories.
What news stories actually happened and what didn't? Can you even be sure a photo is real anymore?
What is with this sudden explosion of AI generated imagery? Feels timed.
Is the DS trying to shape conditions such that video evidence cannot be used in court?
Yup. I think there was a Q post that once hinted that deepfakes were also meant to do the very same thing.
Even if you show what they did they'll claim it was fake.
However, this can also be used against them. After all they have likely been using fake footage and pictures for a while to push narratives. If people didn't know the above image was absurd it looks fairly close to believable.
How many events and images did they "fake" and use for actual narratives?
By forcing them to expose how easily video and pictures can be faked (in order to prevent their crimes from being exposed) they're also exposing just how easy it is to fake news stories.
What news stories actually happened and what didn't? Can you even be sure a photo is real anymore?
Yep, like maybe how they changed video footage of the planes on 9-11?