There's no such thing as a "gay person." Categorizing perversion doesn't make it stop being perversion. Stop putting bright, fluffy labels on degeneracy and pretending it's innate.
A thief doesn't have to steal. A murderer didn't have to murder. An alcoholic doesn't have to drink.
I think that it is useful to separate people who harm children from people who do not. If being overly broad is your thing, you could just call everyone sinners, then you would be in the same category as the pedos. Once someone's sexual nature has been imprinted, there is no changing it. It was not innate from birth, but for all intents and purposes, it is innate as an adult. If you want to reduce harm to children, we need to focus our efforts on exactly the people who are harming them. Burning bridges like you seem to want to do is not going to help the most children.
In the last sentence of your first paragraph, you say that it is not innate, however, your last paragraph seems to be supporting a conclusion around innateness. Do you care to elaborate or make up your mind?
That's patently false. All it takes is one case of someone giving up homosexuality to prove it can be done, and there's many thousands.
And you're absurdly finding contradiction in my argument where there is none. Is someone "innately" a theif? Can alcoholism not be cured? Is it impossible to repent of murder?
Go ahead and spout the next line of propaganda if you want. I'm tired of having the same old arguments over and again, always and already knowing the conclusion.
Only bisexuals choose who to enjoy sex with. If you think otherwise, then you are either bisexual or when you try choosing to willfully change your orientation, you will find that it cannot be done. Some people theorize that most people who identify as straight have some degree of attraction to the same sex, but usually not enough to be of consequence. For those, sexual orientation may feel like a choice, but it is not. You just have to be near 100% attracted to 1 sex or the other to intuitively understand this.
Most people understand that an alcoholic who chooses not to drink is still an alcoholic. To use your word, it is practically innate. If you think that someone can change that, then you do not understand addiction, and then I understand that you did not contradict yourself, you were simply wrong about 2 things.
Repenting and giving yourself to God does not change your nature. This dedication suppresses base instincts. If a person's faith/dedication wavers, then their nature reasserts itself.
One of the many things I've learned on GAW is just how many people still are really outdated in their knowledge around this. It's frankly worrisome and embarrassing.
There's no such thing as a "gay person." Categorizing perversion doesn't make it stop being perversion. Stop putting bright, fluffy labels on degeneracy and pretending it's innate.
A thief doesn't have to steal. A murderer didn't have to murder. An alcoholic doesn't have to drink.
I think that it is useful to separate people who harm children from people who do not. If being overly broad is your thing, you could just call everyone sinners, then you would be in the same category as the pedos. Once someone's sexual nature has been imprinted, there is no changing it. It was not innate from birth, but for all intents and purposes, it is innate as an adult. If you want to reduce harm to children, we need to focus our efforts on exactly the people who are harming them. Burning bridges like you seem to want to do is not going to help the most children.
In the last sentence of your first paragraph, you say that it is not innate, however, your last paragraph seems to be supporting a conclusion around innateness. Do you care to elaborate or make up your mind?
That's patently false. All it takes is one case of someone giving up homosexuality to prove it can be done, and there's many thousands.
And you're absurdly finding contradiction in my argument where there is none. Is someone "innately" a theif? Can alcoholism not be cured? Is it impossible to repent of murder?
Go ahead and spout the next line of propaganda if you want. I'm tired of having the same old arguments over and again, always and already knowing the conclusion.
Too many in America think freedom is from God's law unfortunately
Only bisexuals choose who to enjoy sex with. If you think otherwise, then you are either bisexual or when you try choosing to willfully change your orientation, you will find that it cannot be done. Some people theorize that most people who identify as straight have some degree of attraction to the same sex, but usually not enough to be of consequence. For those, sexual orientation may feel like a choice, but it is not. You just have to be near 100% attracted to 1 sex or the other to intuitively understand this.
Most people understand that an alcoholic who chooses not to drink is still an alcoholic. To use your word, it is practically innate. If you think that someone can change that, then you do not understand addiction, and then I understand that you did not contradict yourself, you were simply wrong about 2 things.
Repenting and giving yourself to God does not change your nature. This dedication suppresses base instincts. If a person's faith/dedication wavers, then their nature reasserts itself.
That's a wonderful series of lies, you've got there.
Testimony from former homosexuals says that's simply not true.
People who define themselves by their sins tend to be more likely to relapse into them.
God ABSOLUTELY changes your nature. It might be slow, but there wouldn't be much point in salvation if it wasn't transformative.
Anyone can be bisexual, y'all straights and gays are both in denial 😎
One of the many things I've learned on GAW is just how many people still are really outdated in their knowledge around this. It's frankly worrisome and embarrassing.