Maybe for the mask issue, but this illegal explicit material might have more weight.
Also, what might not work for one area might work for another area. The group bringing this action have been working on this for many months now, and I have confidence that this will get us somewhere.
The article basically stated that a regular joe was not an appropriate claimant. It wasn't about the issue, per se, it was about the person brining the claim. Which seems like nonsense to me. As you say, these are matters of illegality.
It didn't work on the mask issue because there was no law broken by the officials that mandated it.
I think that is why this one might be so important because there are both state and federal laws against what they did. But let's be honest with ourselves. This action is totally unnecessary if you have an executive branch that you know, upheld and executed the law? But obviously neither Biden or Hochul are interested in that, only in tearing down our society
The article stated it wasn't about the issue per se, it was about who made the claim. If the person making the claim wasn't deemed appropriate, then the whole thing never went anywhere. They said a regular joe couldn't make the claim. I wonder.
Did you read that link? Basically it says they don't work.
Maybe for the mask issue, but this illegal explicit material might have more weight.
Also, what might not work for one area might work for another area. The group bringing this action have been working on this for many months now, and I have confidence that this will get us somewhere.
The article basically stated that a regular joe was not an appropriate claimant. It wasn't about the issue, per se, it was about the person brining the claim. Which seems like nonsense to me. As you say, these are matters of illegality.
It didn't work on the mask issue because there was no law broken by the officials that mandated it.
I think that is why this one might be so important because there are both state and federal laws against what they did. But let's be honest with ourselves. This action is totally unnecessary if you have an executive branch that you know, upheld and executed the law? But obviously neither Biden or Hochul are interested in that, only in tearing down our society
The article stated it wasn't about the issue per se, it was about who made the claim. If the person making the claim wasn't deemed appropriate, then the whole thing never went anywhere. They said a regular joe couldn't make the claim. I wonder.