Now the archive when you browse it apparently shows the following day but I think this has to do with how the baker is performing the snapshots. I think they are snapping in UTC which is five hours ahead. You can see this in the "article:published_time" meta element if you inspect the source.
So I think based on the archive 00:52:37 - five hours would be 7:52:37 EST so I think that is the correct result, which adds a ten minute countdown to your proof. ;)
Hey fren this proof is even better than you're aware because I'm seeing discrepancies on the timestamps across various sites. Check this out:
https://qanon.pub/#3235 7:52:37 EST
https://anontools.xyz/?d=3235 7:52:37 EST (our data source is copied from other Q sites but I honestly can't remember which one we ended up using...)
https://qposts.online/?q=3235&s=postnum 7:52:37 CDT, so 8:52:37 EST
Now the archive when you browse it apparently shows the following day but I think this has to do with how the baker is performing the snapshots. I think they are snapping in UTC which is five hours ahead. You can see this in the "article:published_time" meta element if you inspect the source.
https://archive.ph/20190328013722/https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/5930881.html#5931148
So I think based on the archive 00:52:37 - five hours would be 7:52:37 EST so I think that is the correct result, which adds a ten minute countdown to your proof. ;)
Anyone volunteer to check my work?