Now explain how she can be shot that many times without making an enormous mess. Body cam views were inexplicably brief, but enough to tell a story. That looked an awful lot like a police training than reality.
I'm not here to "explain" anything, as if I'm supposed to defend a certain point of view; all I did was present some evidence to the discussion that was previously missing (different camera shot showing better color saturation).
Also, the face was pixilated beyond comprehension. If we could see the face, that would add a LOT of information we are not privy to. How many videos of people dead from bullet wounds have you studied? How much blood should we expect to see and where might it appear? I personally have seen just a few (mostly posted here), and surprisingly almost zero "mess" at least right away. Probably some blood pooling after a couple of minutes transpire, but a freshly killed body even with multiple bullet holes is mostly covered by the clothes and typically doesn't exhibit much obvious damage until the blood pooling underneath has taken place.
That was directed out into the ether more than it was directed at you. I had seen the perfect video recently to show how bloody things like that are. Now I can't find it, but duckduckgo thinks I'm a psychopath for the search words I had to use. The missing splatter on the walls is really what I find of note. People being shot is a messy business. I am not suggesting that I am convinced this was not real, but I certainly have my suspicions, as I think we all do. It's getting harder and harder to determine what is real when we know so many things are not.
I appreciate your post. I had come to the same conclusion, but not with the certainty that your post provided.
Now explain how she can be shot that many times without making an enormous mess. Body cam views were inexplicably brief, but enough to tell a story. That looked an awful lot like a police training than reality.
I'm not here to "explain" anything, as if I'm supposed to defend a certain point of view; all I did was present some evidence to the discussion that was previously missing (different camera shot showing better color saturation).
Also, the face was pixilated beyond comprehension. If we could see the face, that would add a LOT of information we are not privy to. How many videos of people dead from bullet wounds have you studied? How much blood should we expect to see and where might it appear? I personally have seen just a few (mostly posted here), and surprisingly almost zero "mess" at least right away. Probably some blood pooling after a couple of minutes transpire, but a freshly killed body even with multiple bullet holes is mostly covered by the clothes and typically doesn't exhibit much obvious damage until the blood pooling underneath has taken place.
That was directed out into the ether more than it was directed at you. I had seen the perfect video recently to show how bloody things like that are. Now I can't find it, but duckduckgo thinks I'm a psychopath for the search words I had to use. The missing splatter on the walls is really what I find of note. People being shot is a messy business. I am not suggesting that I am convinced this was not real, but I certainly have my suspicions, as I think we all do. It's getting harder and harder to determine what is real when we know so many things are not.
I appreciate your post. I had come to the same conclusion, but not with the certainty that your post provided.