So far this is the only focus on indicting a presidential candidate that I've seen, but it is maybe more important than focusing on former presidents. Lawfare is part of their election fraud toolbox. One example is Obama's IL senate campaign was able to unseal and publicize his opponent's sealed divorce records to smear him. Even if it didn't truly sway voters, they were able to make it look like it had. This is also why they need controlled media to drive public perception.
My opinion is that Grenell is shining the light on this as a tool of election fraud. Practically speaking, the DS would love to have zero opposition in the election. I support this type of boycott for women's sports teams as a sort of public humiliation to the men competing "as women", but the DS is fighting for its survival and doesn't care about shame.
So far this is the only focus on indicting a presidential candidate that I've seen, but it is maybe more important than focusing on former presidents. Lawfare is part of their election fraud toolbox. One example is Obama's IL senate campaign was able to unseal and publicize his opponent's sealed divorce records to smear him. Even if it didn't truly sway voters, they were able to make it look like it had. This is also why they need controlled media to drive public perception.
My opinion is that Grenell is shining the light on this as a tool of election fraud. Practically speaking, the DS would love to have zero opposition in the election. I support this type of boycott for women's sports teams as a sort of public humiliation to the men competing "as women", but the DS is fighting for its survival and doesn't care about shame.