Let's say I do not see bombshell why they were delayed or what demands prosecution of Fauci. Just that Twitter was J&J-s marketing agent, preparing campaign.
He perjured himself in testimony both in front of congress, and in various lawsuits filed against him. He claimed he never used Twitter or even knew how to use it, and this shows that he was lying. If he lied about something this innocuous, what else is he lying about?
Let's say I do not see bombshell why they were delayed or what demands prosecution of Fauci. Just that Twitter was J&J-s marketing agent, preparing campaign.
He perjured himself in testimony both in front of congress, and in various lawsuits filed against him. He claimed he never used Twitter or even knew how to use it, and this shows that he was lying. If he lied about something this innocuous, what else is he lying about?
Everything. Read my original post.
My question was rhetorical.