The characteristics of this attack are fascinating. Firstly it's demonstrably false and Trump can rebut it whenever he wants. Secondly, it's an attack from a liberal candidate with the underlying assumption that lockdowns were bad.
Consider the conundrum this presents the liberal NPC: Do I run the "lockdowns are good" program or the "orange man bad" program? IMO the "orange man bad" programming always takes precedence so here we may be seeing the signs of the great flip where liberals begin to pretend they were always against all the shit science they just got done going full Nazi over.
Its like we have a candidate on each side, Trump and Kennedy, one to stomp R-Uniparty and Kennedy to stomp D-Uniparty. Kennedy can take the hits and come out in good shape after the D's burn. We'll see, it feels strategic to me.
The problem is that he doesn’t seem to be a strong candidate. Zero charisma and very poor communication/projection. Not that the Dems have good options, but it’s tough to see him captivating the base.
The characteristics of this attack are fascinating. Firstly it's demonstrably false and Trump can rebut it whenever he wants. Secondly, it's an attack from a liberal candidate with the underlying assumption that lockdowns were bad.
Consider the conundrum this presents the liberal NPC: Do I run the "lockdowns are good" program or the "orange man bad" program? IMO the "orange man bad" programming always takes precedence so here we may be seeing the signs of the great flip where liberals begin to pretend they were always against all the shit science they just got done going full Nazi over.
Its like we have a candidate on each side, Trump and Kennedy, one to stomp R-Uniparty and Kennedy to stomp D-Uniparty. Kennedy can take the hits and come out in good shape after the D's burn. We'll see, it feels strategic to me.
The problem is that he doesn’t seem to be a strong candidate. Zero charisma and very poor communication/projection. Not that the Dems have good options, but it’s tough to see him captivating the base.