I'm not sure there is a better example of a circular argument and I've lost interest maybe 3 messages ago. Not because I have nothing more to add, I just stopped caring.
I could spend time bringing up my degree (fancy paper) as you did, my library walls filled with books as you did, and told you how ridiculous your statements are as you did. But for what, another round the block?
And to be clear, other than name drop the people that are attributed to these advancements, proclaim their intelligence, and say they conducted experiments, You provided nothing to prove what I said to be false. As for my original comment, yes, Oppenheimer had a personal Sanskrit tutor, he carried copies of the vedic texts, and he is famous for quoting this exact line. That isn't some fringe theory but fact. So thats where Im at with you, an impasse
Nothing circular. You make wild and unsupported claims, and I refute them by reference to the actual history. You can't even offer any evidence for your claims. (Oppenheimer's reading preferences are not even pertinent, as you have shown no connection to anything crucial in the work at Los Alamos. His quotation is historical, not a fringe theory, but so what?)
Since you are the one alleging, the burden of proof is on you. Prove that there was some ancient writing that provided the key secret of either nuclear energy or rocketry. You have empty hands; whereas the history books have the complete story----which you cannot disprove.
All I brought up is that I have professional expertise in this area. Evidently, you do not. Nor do you have a degree in the physical sciences, I surmise. No impasse. You have nothing. Dropping your argument at this point is only a form of "sour grapes."
Because why? All you have done is spout an assertion for which you haven't the slightest shred of evidence. I have studied the history for each science and the whole path is laid out, step by step.
How is it that the "information" is plentifully available, and you can't bring a single item to mind? (Yeah, yeah, yeah...I've read about "Indra's Dart" and its semblance to a nuclear weapon. So what? Zeus's thunderbolt is like a laser weapon? Act like an adult, for Pete's sake.)
I'm not sure there is a better example of a circular argument and I've lost interest maybe 3 messages ago. Not because I have nothing more to add, I just stopped caring. I could spend time bringing up my degree (fancy paper) as you did, my library walls filled with books as you did, and told you how ridiculous your statements are as you did. But for what, another round the block?
And to be clear, other than name drop the people that are attributed to these advancements, proclaim their intelligence, and say they conducted experiments, You provided nothing to prove what I said to be false. As for my original comment, yes, Oppenheimer had a personal Sanskrit tutor, he carried copies of the vedic texts, and he is famous for quoting this exact line. That isn't some fringe theory but fact. So thats where Im at with you, an impasse
Nothing circular. You make wild and unsupported claims, and I refute them by reference to the actual history. You can't even offer any evidence for your claims. (Oppenheimer's reading preferences are not even pertinent, as you have shown no connection to anything crucial in the work at Los Alamos. His quotation is historical, not a fringe theory, but so what?)
Since you are the one alleging, the burden of proof is on you. Prove that there was some ancient writing that provided the key secret of either nuclear energy or rocketry. You have empty hands; whereas the history books have the complete story----which you cannot disprove.
All I brought up is that I have professional expertise in this area. Evidently, you do not. Nor do you have a degree in the physical sciences, I surmise. No impasse. You have nothing. Dropping your argument at this point is only a form of "sour grapes."
Your crazy dude, straight up. You can check out the information for yourself, there is plenty of it available.
“The access to the Vedas is the greatest privilege this century may claim over all previous centuries.” OPPENHEIMER
Maybe you should reconsider your position.
Because why? All you have done is spout an assertion for which you haven't the slightest shred of evidence. I have studied the history for each science and the whole path is laid out, step by step.
How is it that the "information" is plentifully available, and you can't bring a single item to mind? (Yeah, yeah, yeah...I've read about "Indra's Dart" and its semblance to a nuclear weapon. So what? Zeus's thunderbolt is like a laser weapon? Act like an adult, for Pete's sake.)
Does this mean you are also a Tesla cultist?