If I can remember correctly… I either ran across a substack article or a post on one of the .win boards on this issue a couple of months ago (EMF/5G tech and its potential health risks, especially for cancer) and there were a couple of comments recommending the SPIRO products.
Any comments from someone this kind of a tech background would be appreciated.
It's certainly plausible. A more detailed response would require specific scholarship of the interactions between polarized light of this frequency and the cells (or larger scale structures/modes) of the human body, and whether or not there really is a preferential polarized light of this frequency emitted by our devices. Both of those topics are pretty esoteric (well, at least the first one).
If there is such a deleterious interaction, then blocking it is certainly feasible. Whether or not their tech can accomplish that is another deep dive.
I'd love to try this. Unfortunately I live in an apartment complex. There are currently 13 WIFI channels in range of this computer.
Just out of curiosity… anyone have thoughts on this?
https://noxtak.com/about-spiro/
If I can remember correctly… I either ran across a substack article or a post on one of the .win boards on this issue a couple of months ago (EMF/5G tech and its potential health risks, especially for cancer) and there were a couple of comments recommending the SPIRO products.
Any comments from someone this kind of a tech background would be appreciated.
It's certainly plausible. A more detailed response would require specific scholarship of the interactions between polarized light of this frequency and the cells (or larger scale structures/modes) of the human body, and whether or not there really is a preferential polarized light of this frequency emitted by our devices. Both of those topics are pretty esoteric (well, at least the first one).
If there is such a deleterious interaction, then blocking it is certainly feasible. Whether or not their tech can accomplish that is another deep dive.