Yes, the judge set that bar. Not her attorneys. She/They were very clear that this was a pre-req from the Judge. It's the antithesis of the Constitution and all election laws.
The benchmark for fraud is now 100% fraudulent ballots? Or else it's completely free & fair?
12 Democrats actually* vote for Hobbs and it's fine if 950,000 are fake.
Isn't that the bar that the judge set for them before the hearing? That they had to prove there was literally no signature verification?
Yes, the judge set that bar. Not her attorneys. She/They were very clear that this was a pre-req from the Judge. It's the antithesis of the Constitution and all election laws.
The benchmark for fraud is now 100% fraudulent ballots? Or else it's completely free & fair?
12 Democrats actually* vote for Hobbs and it's fine if 950,000 are fake.
He sat that bar because it is literally what Lake's attorney's were claiming.
They put themselves in an impossible position.