TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] + -ISM (suggestion by another)...if one consents to a suggested -ism by another, then the other gains the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested...which in return frightens the one who shirked response-ability (choice) onto another.
fear
Both hope (want) and fear (not want) implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin (need)...always a choice.
a psychological state of mind
LOGIC (reasoning over suggested) tempts one to ignore PSYCHE (breath, spirit, soul aka adaptation to perceivable).
When I stated "Terrorism is not really defined", I was referring to statutory law. It is indeed ambiguous and purposely done so for the 'color' of law. I provided a link in my comment for further reading and insight to this. The rest of the 'story' goes like this:
Many years ago (in the 1990s) I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? As a result, a male is required to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.
Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.
It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.
The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.
TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] + -ISM (suggestion by another)...if one consents to a suggested -ism by another, then the other gains the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested...which in return frightens the one who shirked response-ability (choice) onto another.
Both hope (want) and fear (not want) implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin (need)...always a choice.
LOGIC (reasoning over suggested) tempts one to ignore PSYCHE (breath, spirit, soul aka adaptation to perceivable).
When I stated "Terrorism is not really defined", I was referring to statutory law. It is indeed ambiguous and purposely done so for the 'color' of law. I provided a link in my comment for further reading and insight to this. The rest of the 'story' goes like this:
Many years ago (in the 1990s) I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? As a result, a male is required to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.
Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.
It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.
The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.