You misunderstood. The question wasn't about if someone should do the right thing. It was a question of WHAT that right thing is. Specifically.
The "cowardly" part is referring to how the WHAT, gets left out.
So it's easy to see why more substance is asked for. Anyone can "stand up" and say, "I want good things and not bad things!" Who could argue with them? Nobody. That's the easy part that is not heroic. The hard part that requires bravery, is putting your plan up for critique.
No one ever wants to say what the 'tough thing' is. IMO that is a cowardly cop out.
Tar and feathers would be a good start.
WTF does 'standing up for truth' even mean? Posting fuking memes? Surely that will win the election or prove fraud. Because Pepe said so.
Why don't you be the first to go full John Wick then and take out the gangsters who threaten the next judge?
You misunderstood. The question wasn't about if someone should do the right thing. It was a question of WHAT that right thing is. Specifically. The "cowardly" part is referring to how the WHAT, gets left out.
So it's easy to see why more substance is asked for. Anyone can "stand up" and say, "I want good things and not bad things!" Who could argue with them? Nobody. That's the easy part that is not heroic. The hard part that requires bravery, is putting your plan up for critique.
how do fight corrupt judges tossing meaningful cases?
Hope I live long enough to see it.