Pentagon was probably a missile - proof is the first pictures showing a hole (this is post-collapse), second is just the angle and height of approach being too difficult for a piloted lumbering airliner. Only could have been a plane if autopiloted (but if it were a plane they would have shown the footage, which we know exists as it was confiscated from the gas station across the way)
WTC1 and 2 probably planes did hit, doesn't matter either way, there is no way they could have collapsed, and certainly no way they both would collapse in similar form, symmetrically, after being damaged asymmetrically.
WTC7 - obviously controlled demolition. I like to think they ran the operation from there and pre-wired it (like the other two).
Flight 97 - shot down probably because the autopilot systems were defeated and there was a danger they would land with that evidence. This was intended for WTC7.
How exactly doesnt matter - the key fact is three buildings definitely did get demolished, which was absolutely unpredictable from plane crashes. The real kicker is the BBC saying WTC7 fell before it did. IMPOSSIBLE that is a "mistake" as claimed by BBC head Mark Thompson who went on to be editor of the NYTimes. The BBC is the smoking gun of foreknowledge.
Once the war on terror kicked off you know what else happened? China had a meteoric rise as an economic power. They took the money made and invested it along with tech transfers into China where you wouldn't notice because they were making a big display in the middle east (which got them even more money to invest in China).
Crime of the century. They also used it as enabling works to establish surveillance and control sufficient to run the covid gambit twenty years later (uh? from China?)
The bigger crime is they got away with it and people fight over the details when the crime is right there.
Pentagon was probably a missile - proof is the first pictures showing a hole (this is post-collapse), second is just the angle and height of approach being too difficult for a piloted lumbering airliner. Only could have been a plane if autopiloted (but if it were a plane they would have shown the footage, which we know exists as it was confiscated from the gas station across the way) WTC1 and 2 probably planes did hit, doesn't matter either way, there is no way they could have collapsed, and certainly no way they both would collapse in similar form, symmetrically, after being damaged asymmetrically. WTC7 - obviously controlled demolition. I like to think they ran the operation from there and pre-wired it (like the other two). Flight 97 - shot down probably because the autopilot systems were defeated and there was a danger they would land with that evidence. This was intended for WTC7.
How exactly doesnt matter - the key fact is three buildings definitely did get demolished, which was absolutely unpredictable from plane crashes. The real kicker is the BBC saying WTC7 fell before it did. IMPOSSIBLE that is a "mistake" as claimed by BBC head Mark Thompson who went on to be editor of the NYTimes. The BBC is the smoking gun of foreknowledge.
Once the war on terror kicked off you know what else happened? China had a meteoric rise as an economic power. They took the money made and invested it along with tech transfers into China where you wouldn't notice because they were making a big display in the middle east (which got them even more money to invest in China).
Crime of the century. They also used it as enabling works to establish surveillance and control sufficient to run the covid gambit twenty years later (uh? from China?)
The bigger crime is they got away with it and people fight over the details when the crime is right there.