Sooner or later, they have to face reality. Sucks for them. Every Christian is not alike, but the Cult has a stranglehold on most and the rest won't speak out, sooooz....
My research has also lead me to understand Switzerland was not neutral during WWII.
The USA was the worlds leading watch manufacturer up until WWII. For two reasons, that changed.
One, US watch manufactures stopped selling to the public during WWII to support the war effort. Two, Switzerland not only attempted to fill that gap, but despite their claim to neutrality during WWII, they provided a lot of support to the NAZI’s including timing devices used in bombs.
Not really relevant to your point, but to wrap up my story… when the war ended congress failed to support and protect the industries that supported them during the war. American watch companies fell years behind the Swiss in innovation and manufacturing capabilities. They could never recover, and direct pleas to congress to intervene went unanswered.
Waltham, Hamilton, Illinois, Elgin, and several others all eventually succumbed to the Swiss.
To be fair, as Henry Ford, General Patton, Charles Limbergh warned: Beware of the International Jews. Who were the International Jews During WWII, the bankers. The International Jews are the cowards, they threw their own people up as shields. Who were the nazis, fascists: The Industrialists and Royal Families. Man, we got a lot of history to unpack and fit together.
ABB you say? I've been watching lineman videos on youtube. This one just popped up with an ABB decal on the transformer box: https://youtu.be/nCdJrkvRSSw
Quite right and true. What does Nazi stand for? Nazi = Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei + Zionist International
The party that founded Israel is the same one that was formed when Hitler's Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei (N.A.) signed a pact with Chaim Azriel Weizmann's Zionist International (Z.I.) and together these two entities created the NAZI Party, in the spring of 1923 in Austria. The commonality between these two diverse groups was the need to get the Ashkanazi (Khazar) 'Juerie' (Jewry) out of Europe. The N.A. hated the bankers and the economic / moral destruction of the Wiemar republic, while the Z.I. wanted every Jew relocated to Palestine. Weitzman's cohort, Greenbaum, made this statement, "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe".
Zionism is the undisputed political rulers overseeing Jewish piety. History tells us that they will not hesitate to murder their own if it advances the Zionist cause.
Fanciful history. The NSDAP (not "N.A.") was founded in 1920 (not 1923) in Munich, Bavaria (not Austria) and taken over by Adolf Hitler in 1921. They never referred to themselves as "Nazis," which was a popular nickname. It was never an official name of anything. Your idea that some agreement was reached with the World Zionist Organization (not Zionist International) to form the "Nazi Party" is at least amusing.
The only "fanciful history" is the leftist Wikipedia article you just quoted. You should know better to trust Wikipedia, which has consistently provided very suspect and dubious information. There was a pact made between Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei (N.A.) and Zionist International (Z.I.). In Jan 1933, Hitler's party had an immediate goal of finalizing the ‘Haavara’ (moving home) Agreement with Zionist International. In 1933-34 Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. Mildenstein, SS Office for Jewish Affairs, traveled to Palestine for half a year accompanied by Zionist officials and spent time at Kibbutz Farms. Zionists thanked Goebbels for the 'race Laws' of 1935.
Even so, the NSDAP was never the "N.A." and the World Zionist Organizaton was never the "Zionist International." The NSDAP was founded in 1920 in Bavaria. The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West. I didn't have to read Wikipedia to know this; I read "Mein Kampf" and "The Fuhrer," both of which are primary sources. If you can't get your basic history correct, I have little faith in the rest of your account.
You really don't know do you? Yet, you pretend to know. I've read those books you mentioned too. In fact I read Eisenhower’s book, *“Crusade in Europe”, Churchill's work, "The Second World War" (6-volumes), and Charles de Gaulle’s work, "The Complete War Memoirs" (3-volumes). That's a total of 10 volumes amounting to over 7000 pages. What is amazing about reading these works, there is not one mentioning of the holocaust in all those volumes. Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'.
Sadly, your tendency seems to run with the dubious Wikipedia version of history. Just as Germans don't call themselves "Germans" either. Along with this, the 'Deutsch' in the Party name is self-evident to the Deutsch of 'Deutschland' and is reiterative. Just as 'American' isn't need for Repubs and Dems. The agreement between Hitler and the Zionists is indeed true. Read Black's "the Transfer Agreement" or Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". Look it up in your go-to-faux-facts 'Wikipedia'. Even they will mention it and provide a concocted version of it.. And the part of having little faith, you already spent your account.
"Nazi" is merely the phonetic shorthand for the first two syllables of "National" (in German, the "z" is pronounced as a "ts"). It was a parallel to the "sotzi" used to designate the socialists.
You got the party founding all wrong. I don't know what insight Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP, but Hitler was instrumental, and Konrad Heiden was the closest journalistic observer from the formation up to 1933. And, by the way, it is not unusual for books written before an event to lack references to the event.
'Wikipedia' seems to be your source for history. Alas, history continues to be altered by those who own the publishing companies. The Rothschild's funded the rise of Hitler's and his Party. I showed you there was proof that an agreement was made between the Zionists and Hitler's Party. Even Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. I provided you two important sources for this agreement. Black's "The Transfer Agreement" and Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". You wrote, "...Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP,..." I never said this. You did. You completely missed the point. Moreover, you did write, "The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West." This is why I wrote, "Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'"......Ergo, regarding Eisenhower, Churchill, and DeGaulle's massive works (over 7000 pages). Albeit, 'Nazi' most likely is a Western concoction, it is IMHO derived from the aforementioned agreement. Again, the reason for the historical ambiguity is from an incessant cover-up of Zionists having a predominant hand in putting Hitler in power. Hitler's ‘Haavara’ Agreement was in essence a competing version of the Balfour Declaration.
No. Not a word of this in "Mein Kampf" or "The Fuhrer." You agree that Eisenhower and DeGaulle had no insight into the formation of the NSDAP, so why did you refer to them at all? The Party did not like the appellation "Nazi" (it was also a slang nickname for "Ignatz" which was a stand-in for a country bumpkin) and did not bother to popularize it. Why should it comment? And what should be remarkable, that a group is identified by an abbreviation of the syllables of its name, "Nazi" for National and "Yank" for Yankee and "Jap" for Japanese?
I looked up the Black book. There seems nothing remarkable about the Nazi government making such an arrangement to get Jews out of Germany, which was "the problem" they were trying to solve. (Contrary to some commentary in reviews, Hitler did not elaborate a "final solution" in "Mein Kampf.") So the agreement was made circa 1933, not in 1923. And there is no hint (in the reviews) that the Jews combined with the Germans to make the "NAZI" party, when the Party was on a death watch in the wake of the Putsch.
Your whole idea that "the Jews" set Hitler up in power is ridiculous. The NSDAP was founded in 1920 (not 1923) in Munich, Bavaria (not Austria) with no Jewish involvement. In 1923 the NSDAP under Hitler attempted a coup of the Bavarian government, which was suppressed and Hitler placed in prison, where he wrote "Mein Kampf." No hint of Jewish involvement. The export agreement would have been possible only when the NSDAP had gained power, and so also the coin. You are trying to extrapolate backwards from events that happened after the Nazis came into power, but time travel is not possible.
Fill in the blank
Ashke_ _ _ _
Thanks for playing
Sooner or later, they have to face reality. Sucks for them. Every Christian is not alike, but the Cult has a stranglehold on most and the rest won't speak out, sooooz....
Nice.
My research has also lead me to understand Switzerland was not neutral during WWII.
The USA was the worlds leading watch manufacturer up until WWII. For two reasons, that changed.
One, US watch manufactures stopped selling to the public during WWII to support the war effort. Two, Switzerland not only attempted to fill that gap, but despite their claim to neutrality during WWII, they provided a lot of support to the NAZI’s including timing devices used in bombs.
Not really relevant to your point, but to wrap up my story… when the war ended congress failed to support and protect the industries that supported them during the war. American watch companies fell years behind the Swiss in innovation and manufacturing capabilities. They could never recover, and direct pleas to congress to intervene went unanswered.
Waltham, Hamilton, Illinois, Elgin, and several others all eventually succumbed to the Swiss.
To be fair, as Henry Ford, General Patton, Charles Limbergh warned: Beware of the International Jews. Who were the International Jews During WWII, the bankers. The International Jews are the cowards, they threw their own people up as shields. Who were the nazis, fascists: The Industrialists and Royal Families. Man, we got a lot of history to unpack and fit together.
ABB you say? I've been watching lineman videos on youtube. This one just popped up with an ABB decal on the transformer box: https://youtu.be/nCdJrkvRSSw
Schneider, ABB and Siemens are the majority of the world’s electrical equipment engineers and suppliers.
Is that through federalization of the Grid or another method?
I think they are talking about the machinery used to comprise and to coordinate and stabilise the grid.
Ah!
Quite right and true. What does Nazi stand for? Nazi = Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei + Zionist International
The party that founded Israel is the same one that was formed when Hitler's Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei (N.A.) signed a pact with Chaim Azriel Weizmann's Zionist International (Z.I.) and together these two entities created the NAZI Party, in the spring of 1923 in Austria. The commonality between these two diverse groups was the need to get the Ashkanazi (Khazar) 'Juerie' (Jewry) out of Europe. The N.A. hated the bankers and the economic / moral destruction of the Wiemar republic, while the Z.I. wanted every Jew relocated to Palestine. Weitzman's cohort, Greenbaum, made this statement, "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe".
Zionism is the undisputed political rulers overseeing Jewish piety. History tells us that they will not hesitate to murder their own if it advances the Zionist cause.
Fanciful history. The NSDAP (not "N.A.") was founded in 1920 (not 1923) in Munich, Bavaria (not Austria) and taken over by Adolf Hitler in 1921. They never referred to themselves as "Nazis," which was a popular nickname. It was never an official name of anything. Your idea that some agreement was reached with the World Zionist Organization (not Zionist International) to form the "Nazi Party" is at least amusing.
The only "fanciful history" is the leftist Wikipedia article you just quoted. You should know better to trust Wikipedia, which has consistently provided very suspect and dubious information. There was a pact made between Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei (N.A.) and Zionist International (Z.I.). In Jan 1933, Hitler's party had an immediate goal of finalizing the ‘Haavara’ (moving home) Agreement with Zionist International. In 1933-34 Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. Mildenstein, SS Office for Jewish Affairs, traveled to Palestine for half a year accompanied by Zionist officials and spent time at Kibbutz Farms. Zionists thanked Goebbels for the 'race Laws' of 1935.
Even so, the NSDAP was never the "N.A." and the World Zionist Organizaton was never the "Zionist International." The NSDAP was founded in 1920 in Bavaria. The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West. I didn't have to read Wikipedia to know this; I read "Mein Kampf" and "The Fuhrer," both of which are primary sources. If you can't get your basic history correct, I have little faith in the rest of your account.
You really don't know do you? Yet, you pretend to know. I've read those books you mentioned too. In fact I read Eisenhower’s book, *“Crusade in Europe”, Churchill's work, "The Second World War" (6-volumes), and Charles de Gaulle’s work, "The Complete War Memoirs" (3-volumes). That's a total of 10 volumes amounting to over 7000 pages. What is amazing about reading these works, there is not one mentioning of the holocaust in all those volumes. Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'.
Sadly, your tendency seems to run with the dubious Wikipedia version of history. Just as Germans don't call themselves "Germans" either. Along with this, the 'Deutsch' in the Party name is self-evident to the Deutsch of 'Deutschland' and is reiterative. Just as 'American' isn't need for Repubs and Dems. The agreement between Hitler and the Zionists is indeed true. Read Black's "the Transfer Agreement" or Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". Look it up in your go-to-faux-facts 'Wikipedia'. Even they will mention it and provide a concocted version of it.. And the part of having little faith, you already spent your account.
"Nazi" is merely the phonetic shorthand for the first two syllables of "National" (in German, the "z" is pronounced as a "ts"). It was a parallel to the "sotzi" used to designate the socialists.
You got the party founding all wrong. I don't know what insight Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP, but Hitler was instrumental, and Konrad Heiden was the closest journalistic observer from the formation up to 1933. And, by the way, it is not unusual for books written before an event to lack references to the event.
And what would be your point?
'Wikipedia' seems to be your source for history. Alas, history continues to be altered by those who own the publishing companies. The Rothschild's funded the rise of Hitler's and his Party. I showed you there was proof that an agreement was made between the Zionists and Hitler's Party. Even Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. I provided you two important sources for this agreement. Black's "The Transfer Agreement" and Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". You wrote, "...Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP,..." I never said this. You did. You completely missed the point. Moreover, you did write, "The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West." This is why I wrote, "Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'"......Ergo, regarding Eisenhower, Churchill, and DeGaulle's massive works (over 7000 pages). Albeit, 'Nazi' most likely is a Western concoction, it is IMHO derived from the aforementioned agreement. Again, the reason for the historical ambiguity is from an incessant cover-up of Zionists having a predominant hand in putting Hitler in power. Hitler's ‘Haavara’ Agreement was in essence a competing version of the Balfour Declaration.
No. Not a word of this in "Mein Kampf" or "The Fuhrer." You agree that Eisenhower and DeGaulle had no insight into the formation of the NSDAP, so why did you refer to them at all? The Party did not like the appellation "Nazi" (it was also a slang nickname for "Ignatz" which was a stand-in for a country bumpkin) and did not bother to popularize it. Why should it comment? And what should be remarkable, that a group is identified by an abbreviation of the syllables of its name, "Nazi" for National and "Yank" for Yankee and "Jap" for Japanese?
I looked up the Black book. There seems nothing remarkable about the Nazi government making such an arrangement to get Jews out of Germany, which was "the problem" they were trying to solve. (Contrary to some commentary in reviews, Hitler did not elaborate a "final solution" in "Mein Kampf.") So the agreement was made circa 1933, not in 1923. And there is no hint (in the reviews) that the Jews combined with the Germans to make the "NAZI" party, when the Party was on a death watch in the wake of the Putsch.
The coin story is well-recounted here: https://jewishnews.com/2018/01/22/a-nazi-travels-to-palestine-a-swastika-and-star-of-david-on-one-coin/ It occurs after the NSDAP gained power.
Your whole idea that "the Jews" set Hitler up in power is ridiculous. The NSDAP was founded in 1920 (not 1923) in Munich, Bavaria (not Austria) with no Jewish involvement. In 1923 the NSDAP under Hitler attempted a coup of the Bavarian government, which was suppressed and Hitler placed in prison, where he wrote "Mein Kampf." No hint of Jewish involvement. The export agreement would have been possible only when the NSDAP had gained power, and so also the coin. You are trying to extrapolate backwards from events that happened after the Nazis came into power, but time travel is not possible.