After enough evidence, incompetence can be considered sabotage. If it’s incompetence then shouldn't it a 50/50 chance that the people would get a few wins? How can you be %100 incompetent and always making decisions that screw the citizens…. And do that consistently for 47 years unless it’s on purpose.
After enough evidence, incompetence can be considered sabotage. If it’s incompetence then shouldn't it a 50/50 chance that the people would get a few wins? How can you be %100 incompetent and always making decisions that screw the citizens…. And do that consistently for 47 years unless it’s on purpose.