For an important period of time, the Voice of America, for example, had an important role in countering the Soviet Marxist propaganda. The Soviet Union was a very real threat to the world and to world freedom.
Moreover, CIA infiltration of all media didn't happen in one year, or five, or ten.
It's a step to say someone heading Voice of America was CIA, compared with individuals who were actually CIA agents and operatives who then 'left' the agency and entered into Media.
In my view, there needs to be more corroborating proof than simply that he was head of VOA. It's a big claim. I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily, but the evidence is pretty limited and is purely argumentative (circumstantial).
To an extent, yes. In this case, he could've done his thing independently of the CIA, and they filtered it and released what they saw fit. Or, they could have completely dictated terms and he cucked, Idk.
Livestreamers aren't CIA controlled. O'Keefe is basically a tier up from that. Small independent media outlets can grow bigger. At some point of funding they get corrupt, this is why I use the term MSM. So I'd offer the counterpoint that all MSM is D's controlled or at least influenced, and we have to find other sources.
Speaking of which, is O'Keefe back to doing good stuff? RSBN? OANN?
Newsmax was about as bad as Faux, but somebody said they've improved?
Thanks for the quick reply.
Thank you for questioning. Wish more did.
I question if that means he was CIA. Isn't it possible he was just a radio guy, even if he was delivering the purposes of the CIA?
All media is CIA controlled
In 2023. But when was Tucker's father involved?
For an important period of time, the Voice of America, for example, had an important role in countering the Soviet Marxist propaganda. The Soviet Union was a very real threat to the world and to world freedom.
Moreover, CIA infiltration of all media didn't happen in one year, or five, or ten.
It's a step to say someone heading Voice of America was CIA, compared with individuals who were actually CIA agents and operatives who then 'left' the agency and entered into Media.
In my view, there needs to be more corroborating proof than simply that he was head of VOA. It's a big claim. I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily, but the evidence is pretty limited and is purely argumentative (circumstantial).
To an extent, yes. In this case, he could've done his thing independently of the CIA, and they filtered it and released what they saw fit. Or, they could have completely dictated terms and he cucked, Idk.
Livestreamers aren't CIA controlled. O'Keefe is basically a tier up from that. Small independent media outlets can grow bigger. At some point of funding they get corrupt, this is why I use the term MSM. So I'd offer the counterpoint that all MSM is D's controlled or at least influenced, and we have to find other sources.
Speaking of which, is O'Keefe back to doing good stuff? RSBN? OANN?
Newsmax was about as bad as Faux, but somebody said they've improved?
Killer response