Well, this is really what we used to do in the old days when Q was posting.

Anons and patriots digging on information, bringing it up, raising questions, then arguing or twisting this way and that way to figure out whether someone or something was WH, BH, Gray hat, or what was going on. Not all of its is necessarily disinfo. Legitimate questions are there. But for sure, the disinfo agents will be in there, stirring up trouble and conflict etc.

It's OK, in fact its good, to have different views on a topic or issue. Weeding out the disinfo opps from the legitimate anon research and Q-type practice is the challenge.

Generally, that comes down to 'vibe', attitude, approach and apparent intent, in my experience.