At the end of the Civil war congress reconvened and passed what was called the United States Reorganization act of 1871, also known as the Act to provide a municipal government for the District of Columbia. However, this government was different; it was structured as a foreign owned CORPORATION and called the UNITED STATES! It even adopted the Republic constitution but changed only one word. They changed the word Constitution FOR the United States, to the Constitution OF the United States.
Therefore this change made the constitution a possession of the government corporation and NOT the possession of the people. The only power this government had was to govern over matters of COMMERCE within the District of Columbia. What we call STATE OF (YOUR STATE), is actually a SUB corporation of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION engaged in matters of commerce. This STATE is not to be confused with the Union State of (your State), which is part of the original pre-Civil war Republic. Therefore, the UNITED STATES (Corp) is foreign to the Union States as its geographic boundaries are restricted to the land area of the District of Columbia. This distinction has been recognized in numerous court cases before the U.S. Supreme court. Don't take our word for it, read from the book Cooperative Federalism by Gerald Brown, Ed.D.
Link to website
https://www.youhavetheright.com/tour1/
The caution I urge is real because this guy is in jail right now.
People that were invited to take tours of the Capitol are in jail too.
Wow!
Thank you for a great post, especially after 9/11. For absolute 'ground zero' awareness of patriots, this should be stickied as a Notable. Also the link to Gerald Brown's free pdf - Cooperative Federalism explaining the meaning and difference between the Declaration of Independence's key term ... the united States of America and the UNITED STATES (Corp).
https://www.youhavetheright.com/tour1/Cooperative_Federalism.pdf
Stickied Fren! Thanks
I agree with this, based on my research, but - does it change anything? The difficulty is being factually correct and being able to have a family and existing in this world is not the same thing.
I’m all for it, I can take the burden of sacrifice, I will fight for our rights returned but this is a huge quagmire to wade through without a network.
And if this is what q and trump’s endgame is, then I will be most pleased.
Agreed 100%
It changes everything, you don’t need their permission. Common law is the law of the land.
Agreed. But common law isn’t able to organize the corporate confusion, there has to be a clear separation between a human and a business.
Once we are all aware, they lose their power!
Thank you Fren.
My pleasure Fren. Stumbled across this and it was even easy for me as a Canadian to understand.
This brings up a question about the Real ID that is being required in 2025. Right now, my ID says that I am a citizen of the state of California. Does a Real ID then make me a citizen of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION? I will no longer be a citizen of a state. I will be a resident of a state, but my citizenship is in the Corporation. Isn't that something to be concerned about?
Your "social security" number already marks you as chattel of the US corporation.
I'm not sure about the particulars on Real ID but I will not get one because of questions like this. Oh no I don't get to fly anywhere!!! I have a passport for that anyway.
From my understanding not all states were compliant with the .gov corp and the Real ID was a way to get everyone to have official federal level "DC ID" so I say no, I will not comply.
So why is Lincoln on MT Rushmore?