You seem to have forgetten the part where Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for a mere bowl of soup. I am no fan of today's Zionists at all, and I despise CI Scofield's perverted margin interpretations, whose version of the Bible was underwritten by Rothschids, but a transaction between Hebrews of old is a transaction.
Jacob deceived Isaac when it came to receiving the blessing delivered by Isaac as a father, but that blessing was not a ceremonial declaration birthright. It was a blessing for a first born, to whom the birthright was traditionally already granted by virtue of his first born birth position (if by only a few minutes), but it was not a ceremonial awarding of a birthright on that occasion. Esau had the birthright by virtue of being first born. Disinheriting a birthright was not at issue.
Transactional disavowal of the rights attendant to the birthright was Esau's choice. Esau had already disposed of that right to Jacob simply because he was hungry. Stupid move, but he did it just the same. He did not value his birthright more than he valued a bowl of soup. Let that sink in.
What is important is the bloodline of Jesus Christ from Adam came through Jacob through David through Mary (collapsing generations in the narrative of course), not through Esau. Edomites were always described in the Scriptures as enemies/adversaries to Biblical Israel.
You seem to have forgetten the part where Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for a mere bowl of soup. I am no fan of today's Zionists at all, and I despise CI Scofield's perverted margin interpretations, whose version of the Bible was underwritten by Rothschids, but a transaction between Hebrews of old is a transaction.
Jacob deceived Isaac when it came to receiving the blessing delivered by Isaac as a father, but that blessing was not a ceremonial declaration birthright. It was a blessing for a first born, to whom the birthright was traditionally already granted by virtue of his first born birth position (if by only a few minutes), but it was not a ceremonial awarding of a birthright on that occasion. Esau had the birthright by virtue of being first born. Disinheriting a birthright was not at issue.
Transactional disavowal of the rights attendant to the birthright was Esau's choice. Esau had already disposed of that right to Jacob simply because he was hungry. Stupid move, but he did it just the same. He did not value his birthright more than he valued a bowl of soup. Let that sink in.
What is important is the bloodline of Jesus Christ from Adam came through Jacob through David through Mary (collapsing generations in the narrative of course), not through Esau. Edomites were always described in the Scriptures as enemies/adversaries to Biblical Israel.