11.09 - BREAKING: AP, Reuters, NYT, CNN coordinated Israel attack.
(www.i24news.tv)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Yes, please feel free to update my link if possible.
When reporters can get there faster than the military, one must question... how? As for coordinating with Hamas... One must then ask, how did Hamas AND the reporters know the border could easily be breached. Lots of time for photographs, but not enough time for attack helicopters to fly 100Kms within several hours?
Either Israel and Hamas are behind this, or it's Santa Claus and the Ester Bunny.
Hamas is a MOSSAD operation...
Difficult to understand how people don't know this...still!
u/#q2461
Did you ever think they lived there? And they weren't reporters or not full time reporters. The press buys photos from all sorts of folks.
Most photographers are freelancers. If you ever known someone who bought a fancy camera, lots of them wonder how they can pay it off/justify the price.
It's all about getting the shot. If your dog farts and blows out the candles on a birthday cake you can sell that footage. If you have "the shot" you can sell that to the news, even if you never worked for them before.
When something starts happening, if they are close to it, they can go out and film it.
I know someone who freelances. A sister of a friend. She doesn't even live in this city, but when she visits, she'll go out to parades, protests, maybe a court case. I have no idea the ratio of pictures she takes to pictures she sells, but I bet it's a ton. Every now and then she's get a picture picked up. The most success it when she goes to a little covered event....less competition....and something newsworthy happens. Then she would be one of the few people who got the shot. I think her main gig is doing taking pictures at small concerts.
She basically is never without her camera. The couple of times I hung out with she would shoot stuff as we were doing whatever we doing, which I assure you was not journalism.
The last two photos I remember that went wide were a local traffic accident and a shirtless guy who climbed a pole at a protest.
This "coordination" claim is coming from an explicitly not just a pro-Israel group but one close to "top officials." This is a red flag for me.
You forget Israel created Hamas and they use Hamas as a tool for ethnic cleansing.
#1438
1508060 IDEN_reconf v. 11.9 Sequence. Attack[s] anticipated. Coordinated? Why are they continuing [internal]? Attacks will intensify [all sides]. Q
https://qalerts.app/?q=11.9
Reminds me of when I saw the photographers with large telephoto lenses mounted onto monopods behind the police line on January 6th as the crowd approached the east side (back) of the capital. Same playbook; different day.
Copied so you don't have to click anything to read the article in its entirety:
A media watchdog went over images from the October 7 massacre published in the world's leading outlets, posing question that are both shocking and self-evident Many of the most shocking images from the October 7 come from the Palestinian terrorists who perpetrated it. And yet, quite a few of the photos published by the world's leading media outlets, including AP, CNN, The New York Times and Reuters, raised troubling questions regarding how the persons whose names appeared in the photo credits found themselves on the scene of the worst antisemitic massacre since the Holocaust.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1722309273940611406
These were the questions starkly raised by the Honest Reporting watchdog: "What were they doing there so early on what would ordinarily have been a quiet Saturday morning? Was it coordinated with Hamas? Did the respectable wire services, which published their photos, approve of their presence inside enemy territory, together with the terrorist infiltrators? Did the photojournalists who freelance for other media, like CNN and The New York Times, notify these outlets?" The report also included a photo showing one of those freelance photographers — Hassan Eslaiah, whose photos from the massacre were used by both AP and CNN — receiving a smooch on the cheek from Hamas leader and October 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar. Reportedly CNN suspended him shortly thereafter.
thank you.
This really fit's well. These people ARE stupid
Insanity
MOSSAD
correct..
What an annoying fking website...
https://m.jpost.com/middle-east/article-772410
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/nov/8/ap-reuters-photographers-scene-hamas-attack-spurri/
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/reuters-denies-it-had-prior-knowledge-oct-7-hamas-attack-israel-2023-11-09/
https://honestreporting.com/photographers-without-borders-ap-reuters-pictures-of-hamas-atrocities-raise-ethical-questions/
So, they knew and did nothing to prevent those people being taken hostage and killed. Smh
Did they volunteer to be collateral damage, or were they ordered to go there?
You gotta wonder, large payouts? Is it worth risking your life? Or….Is it all a movie set and they are relatively safe? OR….. Did they get filmed doing unspeakable things with kids and blackmailed? 10 years ago my past “me” would think my future “me” had lost her mind.
--surprised pikachu face--
Lets not forget that scumbag Hannity, and Clay and Buck, pumping this bs.
u/#q1871
u/#q4125
Should have been slightly obvious with all the footage immediately available as it happened.
The simplest hypothesis is that Hamas reached out and "recruited" sympathetic freelance photographers in advance, and had them in place, pending the date of the actual operation, when they were infiltrated into the battle scenes. Then the photographers sold their coverage to the highest---or most agreeable---bidder. Modern news media have long ago sold their souls for access to on-the-scene coverage early in the news cycle.
No, the simplest hypothesis is Israel, who created Hamas, wanted international news coverage of the attack spread far and wide, to gain sympathy, to gain monetary support from the USA and to justify the premeditated ethnic cleansing.
Edit: You always enter the conversation as controlled opposition. Given your account name, what do you know about Lahaina?
You talk about motives, not about how what took place happened. I still think the Hamas-photographers handshake is the simplest. I have seen other news that the photographers were simply Hamas to begin with. Right now, it is redounding to the support of Hamas, as reflected by the startling degree of popular support.
No, I enter the conversation as someone not brainwashed by a preconceived narrative. You have worked yourself into the typical paranoic pose that anyone who is not with you is against you. As regards Lahaina, I consider the idea of space lasers to be absolutely nuts. Quite aside from the technical likelihood (zero), it is absurd to think that advanced technology was something that needed to be used instead of a kitchen match or cigarette lighter. On other points, melted aluminum wheels have been found in other runaway forest fires. (All four wheels being melted would be inconsistent with a laser that can fire from only one direction.) And roofs of all colors were either burnt or not. (I think most blue roofs were of homes that were nowhere near the fire.)
What happened was the ultra secure border was disabled and IDF was moved from the area, opening a gateway for the attack, which means it was a false flag attack, thus giving justification for the response, kill everything, expanding their property lines.
I'm not sure if you caught the video of Ron Paul saying Israel created Hamas to counter the PLO. If not look it up, you can find it on this site by searching Ron Paul. Israel has been using Hanas attacks as a reason to spread their land grab for many years. The MSM being in place during the attack to spread the attack coverage was intentional to gain support among the Epstein blackmailed politicians and force monetary support. You see, Ukraine funding is gone, drug and child trafficking money is gone, Rothchild support is gone, Israel has no income at the moment. Monetary support from the USA was critical. However, this is another clue for everyone watching, it points out every politician under Mossad control.
Yes, Trump is supporting Israel but that is his only option temporarily. I think the mass deportation that Trump speaks of may happen sooner than expected. All we need is a Hamas terrorist attack here in the USA and deportation of every Hamas affiliated illegal alien can begin. Once it is realized, Israel who is saved for last, was the mastermind behind everything, who controlled our media, then the second wave of deportations and arrests can begin.
I was only digressing in a humorous way that you had any affiliation to the Hawaii event. However, for you to deny the technology exists is kinda self revealing. Look up Rods of God, you can find videos out of Israel. Trump just gave a speech talking about it. To say that technology can't be placed on a satellite or a plane exposes your true motivation. Controlled opposition.
Your entire line of logic hinges on the question of why and how the IDF was caught napping, which has yet to be determined. Meanwhile, what are you saying? That Israel should be recumbent before unparalleled terrorist attacks? It is precisely like saying, upon the Pearl Harbor attack, that we should just suck it up. The culpability of that one was suspected long ago. My father, who fought in World War II (antisubmarine warfare in the Atlantic Ocean before the war was even declared) told me that it was generally suspected that FDR had provoked the Japanese to an incident---but that they figured it would be only the Philippines, not including Hawaii. So, yes, I know all about sinister turns of policy, but in this case it changes very little. Hamas are murdering mad dogs and Israel needs to wipe them out. If somebody is culpable in releasing mad dogs, they need to be tried for treason.
As to my bona fides, part of my career was designing laser weapons, as I have stated repeatedly. The "technology" has been around for half a century. But there are no satellites with ground-facing laser weapons. They turned out to be too big and essentially impossible to deploy. Using them on ground targets was a non-starter, as they were entirely unreliable for that purpose. (The beam would be blocked by clouds or smoke.) That was back in the 1980s. I wrote the proposal for YAL-1A, the only laser weapon mounted on an airplane and demonstrated successfully (now scrapped). Compared to me, you know zero.
"Rods of God" are only science fiction devices. They would be ineffective and they were not developed any further than Jerry Pournelle's idea. (No process for turning kinetic energy into an explosion. They would simply penetrate into the ground, like penetrating tank shells.) Very nasty hazard once their orbit decayed and they came down unguided. I looked for what you referenced but only had hits that were totally off target, or went to speculatory articles. Easy to tell when someone has no clue, as they often show the weapon being boosted in the direction of orbit. If that were the case, they would go into higher orbit and never hit the ground. In order to hit the ground, they would need to be decelerated backward, opposite to the direction the "rod" is pointing. Orbital mechanics. Not for wannabees.
To say that technology was used that would never have been required and not available, costing major expense if it had been, and referring to imaginary weapons exposes your ignorance and your motivation: myth making.
You love to idolize yourself, you know that is a sin, correct? You also lie which is also a sin. I notice most of your comments are always in the negative digits because no one is buying your garbage.
Here is a video talking about laser weapons. It is often said, the technology released to the public is 50 years behind what they have in hiding.
https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1713623115337752592
Check the video from Israel recently, scroll down to see it.
https://twitter.com/ShadowDefense2/status/1713440760622698602
This is old news. I have repeatedly made the point that ground- and ship-based units at this power level are in trials. Israel has had to advance that schedule. Our versions have been available for perhaps 5 years.
"It is often said" is generally bullshit. Not said by anyone who knows anything. The technology for this has been public since it was demonstrated at the laboratory level. In the late 1970s, I watched video of a comparable laser weapon drill a melted hole into a tethered, hovering helicopter. Maybe not in the newspapers, but also not classified, and usually available as news from publications like Aviation Week & Space Technology. (So much so, that in the industry, it is often nicknamed "Aviation Leak.")
The only embarrassment here is that you are simply failing to pay attention. I'm trying to educate you, and you just spit it up.
First you say the technology doesn't exist, then you say we have had the same technology for 5 years, perhaps the 1970's. You act as though the technology we have is different from Israeli technology. You fail to realize that the Epstein honeypot blackmail scenario gives Israel leverage to acquire any technology that exists. Your total existence on this site is centered around opposition to every theory that makes the deep state look bad, who is paying you?
Your site name symbolizes some extreme knowledge, your negative feedback fits the name. You pat yourself of the back, demean everyone you speak with. You think you are the only person here with an objective opinion and act as though everything you speak is set in stone. This exposes the controlled opposition narrative, who pays you?