Dr. Jan Halper AGAIN confirms that Military Tribunals have been and continue to take place.
She also confirms:
✅ She holds dual UK/ US DOD Security Clearances.
✅ Because of her clearances, she has a Military contact who feeds her this information.
✅ Her contact confirmed there IS a global Military alliance being spearheaded by Space Force.
✅ The Military told the world on Jan 18, 2021 of a “Peaceful transition to Military Power” on ABC News.
✅ Navy JAG is running the Tribunals.
✅ Many “bigger moves” are being made by the Military behind the scenes.
My research and discernment tells me that Dr. Halper was absolutely tasked with bringing these messages of confirmation and hope to the Patriot community at this time.
Quite frankly, it’s common sense Psychology. Any good Military leader knows that the morale of soldiers and civilians is paramount during a war.
The military tasked truthers and Anons with helping to fight in this 5th Generation Information war.
They have known that as the end nears, people will be weary, concerned and tired.
Does it not make perfect sense that they would have someone with direct, credible Military connections deliver some confirmation to us all?
Does it not make perfect sense that they would have someone with direct, credible Military connections deliver some confirmation to us all?
It does, that's what can make unsubstantiated claims so dangerous. It might lift morale in the short term, but if untrue, or exaggerated, can lead to more damage in the long run.
Treat such claims as data points and take them with a pinch of salt unless they bring receipts.
We have Fake News MSM and everyone crying if reelected President Trump will kill all his political adversaries. Did they believe with treason and Crimes against Humanity they would get a cookie ?
I kind of equate Q with Thomas Paine's "Common Sense". "Common Sense" was the most important Patriot pamphlet issued during the Revolution. It woke an entire Nation and created the awareness and resolve to oppose tyranny. I think Q's most important contribution is creating that same awareness and resolve today.
Interesting footnote of History:
Washington had "Common Sense" read to his troops before they crossed the Delaware.
I do this with everything. I can see with my own eyes, though, that the overall tenor and direction of the operation is positive and that progress is being made.
Probably my most reliable gauge for this is the reactions and narratives on MSM. They always tell you what they are afraid of. When they speak of Trump being authoritarian and that he will imprison his political foes, this isnt only projection by them, it is also raw fear that Trump has the receipts and will prosecute traitors.
Also consider the recent murder porn articles on Trump. They seem to be calling out to their mkultra slaves to try a lucky shot since they cant seem to do it with the professionals.
Their problem is we are on to the game. We are no longer NPCs. They cant gaslight us into acting against our own best interests. We realize that Trump arresting traitors is a feature, not a flaw, no matter how hard they try to rebrand traitors into heroes standing strong for "their" Democracy. The absurdity on display every day has done nothing but reinforce the idea that the DC ruling class are all criminal grifters in the least but likely traitorous. 'Fake News' went from the Battle Cry of the Anons to ubiquitous. Theres no escaping the Awakening now.
So I listen to Jan and dont discount what she is saying as I can see a scenario where it is likely happening at some level. But I also wont throw all my eggs in that basket and allow complacency.
IF she is privy to this information from her security clearance is she not then breaking a law by telling people about it? IF these tribunals are happening in secret then they must be classified. So how on earth can she can keep directly telling people classified information without losing her security clearance or arrested?
Also in the video the interview asks her if shes allowed to share this, and she dodges the question. This concerns me.
I can see potential for her to be a controlled opposition agent. Though that would likely put her as a slow burn operative that ends up being made to look like an unreliable nut job in the end.
Her claims seem like this to the normies who I have heard that have seen her videos. Her info/ideas she spouses could easily backfire for the great awakening if things do not turn out the way she claims.
That is if she is a black hat/controlled & blackhats are claiming ground.
I could be wrong, and I often am, I thought the term was "Fantastic", which is generally considered good by society. Though there are some things that are too fantastical to be believed.
He also praised the accomplishments of RBG & while I agree she was a very accomplished woman, & it can be sad to see loss of life, I don't believe that many of her supreme court decisions & positions were great.
I am not certain which way to lean with her, though she certainly is a catalyst of some sort.
Read this and decide. Notice how Fake News MSM has been claiming if president Trump is elected he was going to kill all his political adversaries ? Did they think with Treason and Crimes against humanity they were going to earn a cookie for a reward ?
Or she’s a chaos agent, Judas Goat gatekeeper - ultimately Masonic - blabbing pre-ordained limited hangout content for obfuscation and/or shits and giggles. She’s likely working from a script.
And this is where we’re at with all of them, anyone speaking counter to The Narratives.™️ They’re either genuine whistleblowers, loony-tunes dingbats, or narcissistic psychopaths getting a kick out of being puppeteered.
I like her. I get how raw everyone is about being lied to by pretty much everybody, but what happens when truth shows up at last? We doubt it, and we shit all over it so we don't look like fools once again.
Whatever. My feeling is that she's bringing what she's been given the okay to bring. She's clearly not an idiot, and she's also clearly in support of DJT and the White Hat Plan.
How can you Dr. Jan haters all forget that nobody gets wind of what the military is up to until it's all done?
I don't know much about her, but everything seems credible.
It would be nice of there was some type of Q proof or even a new drop that could somehow be discerned as validation of her credibility.
Equally as true as your assessment is the possibility that she is a fraud... and the irony is that this effort she is supposedly confirming for us is what taught us to be skeptical. So, we need a "Halper of suace" ... haha, get it?
That does help. Thanks. I was aware of this article... it doesn't go as far as I would like though--it could just be that her deductions are on the mark and that's what Trump confirmed.
If Q could just email me directly with irrefutable proof that she is legit, then Iwill be happy : )
Lynn wood. I’ve been attacked for poopooing her but why would wh’s let the enemy know the next move? She’s a larp. Shill! If there is a plan, according to q, only 5 know it. 3 military and two civilian. The rest may be playing a part but that part is to inject disinfo. Never interfere with the enemy while it is destroying itself. The plan is an awakening that cannot be stopped. Once awake, the populace will demand Justice. Pray. Trust in God. And be patient while the enemy exposes itself for what it is. It is an invisible enemy. Christ said, “come out of her my people!” The great harlot is the beast system that was set up as the rejuvenated Roman Empire. 1871 saving Israel for last!
I love that people are staying frosty w/respect to Jan.
...but it is hilarious how many frens here seem more intrigued by stuff like qofficial.net, Ingersoll Lockwood, usdebtclock, or George over someone directly and publicly validated by Trump. 🤣
Amen, I have noticed that also. I remember when President Trump acknowledged her on Truth Social. If not mistaken someone posted that here a while back.
I was okay with her when she only hinted at it, but now she is directly telling people that it's happening and freely telling people classified information would land her in hot water. She also dodges the question hard when the interviewer asked her if she is allowed to share this information. Something ain't right with this.
Dude idk why this concept is so hard for people on this board. It’s obvious they have been happening.
John Mcains daughter and John kasich both said he was executed and that was a LONG time ago. You think they just magically stopped tribunals after one person? Hell no. I would wager most of the evil corrupt people we know of are already dead.
Also no one said we would witness executions. And also where do you think all the loud obnoxious assholes went? They used to be in the news near daily and you don’t hear a peep hardly. (DiCaprio, Obamas, Clinton’s, bush’s, etc.) they literally dominated the news cycle and now you see them allegedly a couple times a year and usually never up close.
Yeah DiCaprio isn’t a good example but the climate change voices have been quieter too. Even others like Oprah, Ellen, and big names that were around a good bit have basically gone silent.
And which direction is the witch hunt? Could “masterpiece” be sarcastic? If it’s fake news but Trump doesn’t want to say something explicit to discredit it outright at the moment so that Jan’s team (which by her description would be part of the current Biden/Obama administration) gets an opportunity to spin its web more, what kind of post might he write to get anons’ attention on it?
Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes is fantastic. Everyone has got to watch her interview on election fraud with the poor sap who got taken apart by her. Thank you Don Jr. for putting this masterpiece out for the public to see. WITCH HUNT!
Aug 06, 2023, 6:19 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110845227764397486
"Fantastic"
based on fantasy (see FANTASY entry 1 sense 2) : not real
conceived or seemingly conceived by unrestrained fancy
I file her under 'follow around and find out'. It was a big deal that Trump praised her GB News interview, which they now pretend never happened. Plus she's not trying to sell alien sexdust-powered flash drives or whatever they were like Simon Parkes.
The only way she could reveal this is she was give the okay. If she was not, they would have silenced her by now. Saying all that, until I see DJT say it is going on I will be a hopeful skeptic.
On a previous post of one her videos, which was later taken down by a mod, I wrote it would be nice if we had some kind of proof of just one tribunal. If Navy JAG is doing this , where is it being done? GITMO? On ships? If this is the case, can’t we track where all ships are, there movements, their mission?
This is good story for the 48 hour rule. If necessary, a 168 hour rule. Maybe even a 720 hour rule.
No Name’s tribunal was obviously done out of sight if one happened at all.
Do I want tribunals to happen? Yes! But I also feel that all instruments of justice should be public, just for the sake of being accountable. Also, all of us in the cause would like to see justice meted out and there are still normies needing to be red pilled. Seeing evidence of Hillary’s involvement in U1, or seeing evidence submitted against Obama and Biden , especially crimes against children would unite the 94 to 96%.
How do you avoid a major civil war with a Nation deeply divided ? Do you hold trials and convictions in secret while exposing this evil to the world and waking people up ?
How in the 10 days are we watching their trials and confessions if they are being rounded up ?
With a informed world while there will be violence from fanatics but how many more lives were saved because of secrecy and exposing this evil to the world ?
Reflect back to HCQ and Ivermectin and the response back then to today. Those who listened were saved from the harm from the Jab. This showed us exactly where we were globally back then. Not only are we avoiding a major civil war but a global one also.
I’m also conflicted by this. Are the tribunals going on now as we all wish. If so, who is being tried and what are the charges? What evidence is being presented? If found guilty, what is the sentence and where will it be carried out? OR Is this a big fraud?
For this leak I suspect they are done with the Big Shots. The fleas are possibly be collected now. Think about the funerals of those we were made aware of and wrinkled flags on coffins.
Also, in direct reference to her arguments views on "election fraud".
The Trump truth essentially praises how she "took the poor sap apart", with that emphasis.
I'm a skeptic. Besides, how can you say "confirms"? She asserts once again, but where are the receipts? No receipts, it's not a confirmation, but an assertion.
Fake News MSM crying about president trump being reelected he will kill all his political adversaries. They are crying for a genuine reason this time. Treason and Crimes against Humanity and sex with children come with no Statute of limitations.
Lakota, you've posted this link in the comment section TWELVE times. Are you sure you're not a little obsessed an infatuated with The Halper phenomena?
Q did not give us inside secret information. Q used teh socratic meathod to get people to think and question using open sources of information, in order to put the pieces together and join the dots.
Question: What benefits do you see Halper as conferring on the Awakening movement?
Congratulations you counted each and every one of them. Now ask who really is infatuated ? Projection time ? How many times have we repeated information tp help those just waking up ? Do you prefer to help them or keep the information from them ? How does that help us to help them ? Please explain.
Um, noticing that you've posted that link again and again and again, and then casually glancing to see actually how many times isn't anything more than looking at a fact.
I did it because such prodigious spamming of a link very rarely happens in any posts I see on GAW, and when it does, the OP might reiterate their point 3 or 4 or 5 times, but nothing like what you've done here. I myself have done it a few times, posted something I thought very relevant to clarify or direct a commenter to my post in some direction, but never more than a few times, and on those occasions, readers have pointed out the slightly obsessive nature of the act.
Perhaps I don't read your posts or comments closely enough, but you seem uncharacteristically personalized and dare I say bordering on passive/aggressive in your commenting here. "congratulations".
Jeepers. Sorry if my comments or questions offend you. They are just comments.
I am so happy you love yourself. Your words have no power until I decide, now go back to the farm and know you are not able to even be recycled. Team Biden is a no go.
Q confirmed that No Name was executed. Any other confirmations? So, how many executions have taken place? Why in secret? What would be the public response if they learned that all in secret, 'white hats' have been executing folks?
There was another operation that spread the gitmo executions etc, etc, etc narrative, which, when it first appeared, some actually used the argument that this operation has been tasked with X agenda. namely to 'leak' the real information out in order to prepare for public exposure to 'upcoming reveals'.
That operation functioned 2.8 years ago, directly after Jan 2021, and was called real raw news. The level of bogusness was off the charts.
If you think Halper is a realiable source, then make the argument why, including with reference to the Q method that is the backbone of the awakening.
I generally like your posts, but the attachment to "halper or bust" seems .... less than well founded, imo.
So explain to me this. How when all things getting shut down. We are supposed to watch their trials and confessions while they are supposedly arresting them during that time frame ?
Jan Halper was part of Trump's transition team. Does the photo below seem to indicate Trump is slightly excited to be in her presence? Little clues like this have meaning.
She works for the DOD. Trump is reposting memes that indicate he is Commander in Chief. Trump has reposted interviews with Jan Halper. I do not think Trump would go out of his way to promote Halper if she was a larp.
You have been told this is a movie which tells me most likely everything we have been waiting for has already happened. NCSWIC most likely means, it can't be stopped because it has already taken place.
How many photos has DJT taken with people including those that have worked with him, etc, where he's grinning and showing a thumbs up. I'd guess literally thousands. (Recall he shook the hands of a thousand or so military academy graduates?) Do they all have meaning like this?
Works for the DOD?
Do we have direct corroborative evidence of that? I've not seen any. I'm open to seeing it if it exists. Note4 also, she says directly "Worked at the DOD here in the UK" Past tense.
Trump has reposted interviews with Jan
I know of only one. If there are more, I'd like to see them. As far as I know, only 1 retruth, in which he praised her interaction aka interview about 'election fraud'.
NCSWIC most likely means, it can't be stopped because it has already taken place
Well, that's pure opinion. I don't agree, myself. NCSWIC very well maps on to game theory that the game board is or has been structured so as to define the ultimate outcome. As in Chess, where the winning player may well know exactly that nothing can stop his checkmate from coming, but the opponent doesn't know yet and the checkmate itself hasn't happened.
That was a question, I was asking for an opinion, and you gave it. In my opinion, he does seem excited. You say he shook thousands of hands, did they all work on his transition team?
Works for the DOD?
Ya, you could be correct, maybe she is lying. Thats why Trump reposted her video, to show everyone she is a liar. If she was lying about her DOD position do you think Trump would give her the time of day?
"he praised her interaction aka interview about 'election fraud'."
I think that interview covered several topics, I do remember her mentioning 650 planes with gold. I think if there was any inaccurate information in that interview Trump would not have reposted it.
NCSWIC
My rationalization is pure opinion, what is yours? The same. It is a well settled opinion that "no name" was executed for treason. No one from the Trump admin has ever confirmed this fact yet it is a theory that is agreed upon.
How many others have met the same fate? The current Joe Biden looks very different from the old Joe Biden, could the old Joe be 6 feet under? Maybe he has been shot, like Trump suggested many times.
How many times have we seen Hillary's body double filling in for her? Do you know Hillary is still alive? Maybe all the current video of Hillary was pre-recorded before her tribunal and execution and they roll the pre-recorded video when it is appropriate. I know Hillary's pic on her Twitter page of her sitting with a black child hasn't changed in 5 years. https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton
The wayback machine says she has had that same pic up since Oct of 2018. It is such an odd picture, you would think she would have taken 2 seconds to place something newer in the last 5 years, doncha think. She has 3 grandchildren, yet she chooses a pic of some black child, kinda telling, she isn't around any longer.
I am sure they have evidence of Hillary's crimes against children, it came out in an IG report on the Clinton Foundation. Do you think they would not prosecute, let her walk away so she could harm more children? The evidence on Weiner laptop made many of detectives vomit and coincidently many of them are dead now. Evidence that revolting and they set her free? I don't think so.
Maybe that is why Q called it a movie, you are watching actors, the originals are long gone and thus, NCSWIC.
Thanks for your detailed and passionate reply. Appreciated!
"Trump is slightly excited to be in her presence"
That was a question, I was asking for an opinion, and you gave it.
Yes, you are correct. You did frame it as a question.
I guess a more direct reply for me would have been "I don't think the photo indicates that Trump is ESPECIALLY excited to be in her presence". Sorry if that wasn't clear.
In my opinion, he does seem excited.
OK. You may well be right! I thought the photo was a bit small to see much detail tho. A larger resolution would have been nice, but maybe there aren't many of those around. EDIT: I found a much better resolution one here
You say he shook thousands of hands, did they all work on his transition team?
Obviously no. But my point is, having a photo of Halper-Hayes standing next to Donald Trump with him flashing a big grin and a thumbs up is, for me, nothing that seems in any way out of the ordinary. Just as a photo of Trump in proximity to Epstein doesn't indicate that Trump and Epstein were working in cahoots or that Trump was compromised by Epstein.
Also, I speculate that he's probably done many of such photos, with members of the transition team, or any other team, that he's worked with on various projects or campaigns, etc. What makes this one special, except for the idea that "it means something special"? Empirically, is it special?
But obviously that's subjective. You think the photo says something special. I don't. Different opinions. Nothing wrong with that, right?
I guess I can see that you take a LOT of little things and that you weave them together to form a much larger picture that to you seems quite consistent. "Little clues like this have meaning."
However, personally, I'm wary of extensive theories that have (in my view) an over-emphasis on pure reasoning and conjecture as the basis for elaborate explanations, and think its important to consistently check the ideas the more one moves along.
I mean, isn't a theory really only as good as far it can be tested against actual empirical evidence? If a theory can stand up to rigorous questioning and eliminate any alternative explanations for the observed phenomena, then it's good. If alternative explanations are possible, doesn't ignoring them simply weaken the theory instead of strengthening them?
Theories that are strengthened through ignoring alternative explanations become dogma. We, when we hold to them regardless of alternative explanations, become dogmatic. Dogmatism is a trap very easily fallen in to by those who overly focus on their own reasoning because of held but (unrecognized) beliefs or bias confirmation, etc.
"Works for the DOD?" "Do we have direct corroborative evidence of that?"
Ya, you could be correct, maybe she is lying.
For me, that is not the point. Maybe I'm just a reformed Reaganite? (dis)Trust, but verify? I don't necessarily think that she's lying, but she has made a LOT of claims as far as I know, and I personally think that corroborative evidence - factual and empirical evidence that can be verified - is important in establishing the truth. But maybe that's just me?
The more claims, the greater the relevance or need for some sort of evidence backing at least some of them up. It's certainly possible to develop elaborate theories, hard held beliefs and passionate convictions based entirely on reasoning, speculation and inference, etc., but my own approach is that that evidence and facts are also very important when it comes to establishing truth, which is what any of us, I assume, would want our theories, beliefs and convictions, etc, to be based on.
One of my favorite Q quotes is the one on freedom of thought (emphasis added).
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
My rationalization is pure opinion, what is yours? The same.
Yes. That's true. I guess that I'm simply questioning the reasoning behind "NCSWIC most likely means, it can't be stopped because it has already taken place"
As in, why does NCSWIC most likely mean = [X]?
I think that's a highly subjective conclusion, not very objective, and I gave an example to show another very plausible explanation (in my view) of what NCSWIC could mean. So why does it 'most likely' mean (it already happened)?
I'm not saying you cannot have or express your own opinion. I just saying I find it highly subjective in this case, and I wanted to emphasize that.
I don't know if you are doing it, but I'm wary if it seems like someone is conflating their own opinion with a fact, or their belief with a fact, because if they then carry on extensive reasoning and argument AS IF that opinion is a fact, they can get further and further away from the recognition that what they are doing is speculating and they end up conflating their entire belief system with .... fact.
I mean, I think I can sense that you have a very firm and powerful conviction about your own conclusions, but a lot of it seems like very subjective reasoning to me, and that makes me wary and also makes me want to question whether the dozens of tiny premises on which the bigger picture is based are actually reasonable, or better yet, verifiable through evidence.
How many others have met the same fate? ..... .... Maybe that is why Q called it a movie, you are watching actors, the originals are long gone and thus, NCSWIC.
Thanks again for sharing your perspective on all that. I do thinks its food for thought and there is some good reasoning there. I don't mean my comments or questions as a personal attack, and I'm grateful you've elaborated your thinking.
It seems to me that we take a certain set of facts and reason them out along very different lines. I think that could be an advantage if understood from the viewpoint that very often, it is contrastive perspectives that highlight little understood aspects.
On the other hand, maybe you just see everything in perfect clarity and I'm just seeing 1/3 of it, and so I doubt your explanations! I mean, that's possible too, right?
In any case, thanks again for the response and discussion.
Exactly, The truth is being exposed to the world. This truth will bring us together. Notice the changing of the old guard in progress and people taking back their country .
Anyone who has risen from obscurity into the limelight on the lamestream paytriot circuit should certainly be scrutinized. She's the same as Juan the con. Regurgitating shit we already know and/or suspect while alluding to inside sources.
She's a sophist by definition. People choose their own bread & circuses.
I think you're mistaking critical thinking and healthy skepticism with 'dooming'. And you may well be confusing 'hopium' with actual hopermectin. There's a reason why the expression 'hopium' rings with and is derived from 'opium'. It's more about the narcotic impact of false or ungrounded news than it is about fact-based, empirically sound and reasoned information.
You have to listen with discernment. The fact of her having clearances has no relevance to what she is reporting. The factual allegations being reported are taken from open sources, so there is no disclosure of classified information or spreading of falsehoods. Anything else would be her speculations as to what may be happening "behind the scenes," which she qualifies as speculation (albeit intuitive and informed).
It is good to go, for what it is. It may not go as far as you want. The witch-hunt cavils are meritless.
A little parable:
After many trials, Jonah comes to Nineveh to preach God's warning. The crowd is interested...but some with reservations begin to exclaim: "His hair is not white enough. Has he talked with God? He's not carrying the two tablets! Can he touch his staff to rock and make water spring forth? Can he part the Tigris River? What was he before he came to sermonize? Is this a scheme to collect alms? Is he a Satanist, telling lies?" Jonah has no answer, and sadly departs.
Fake News MSM has been crying that president Trump gets reelected he will kill all of his political adversaries. They forget to mention Treason and Crimes against Humanity. Were they expecting to get a cookie for a reward ? Here is a link.
Let's do a little myth busting analysis, shall we?
When questioned RE: the information she was going to share (0:50), the interviewer asks "you're allowed to share this?" to which she responds, in a somewhat protesting tone, not looking at him, but with closed eyes:
"ma...uh... this is my UK military... wait tll you see... hear what I share"
At 1:53, quoting the text sent to her, she says (reads)
major general william walker announced, live, on morning news, in front of the ring fence DC, on the 3rd Monday of January, Martin Luther King day, we are here to provide a smooth transition to military power.
But he doesn't say that at all. He says the smooth transition OF military power.
In the full interview, Walker says he is there to assist the police force, and the secret service. "we're trained for civil disturbance.."
Walker was at the time commander in chief and other roles with "the Joint Forces Headquarters, Washington, District of Columbia" since 2012 (Obama administration era).
Who controls Washington? Does anyone believe that a Washington based commander for more than 8 years would be anything but a swamp rat?
Another interview on the same day confirms that he and what he's doing is exactly what it looks like: taking care of Washington National Guard for the (fraudulent) "transition of power" from the Trump Administration to the Biden (illegitimate) administration, aka "Inauguration security".
But those who latch on to Halper's claims here are doing nothing but repeating the hype that surrounded those days, when so many who knew "the inside scoop" said that in fact the military was taking over, and that all that stuff was just for show, etc, because now the military is going to put the black hats down.
To me, this directly calls into question Halper's claims, because the simple statement of the Washington (Swamp central) top military commander said "smooth transition OF military power" and yet, its presented as "To military power".
Prior to this, she reads (quote): "“air vice marshal paul godfrey went live 2021 to announce UK space force and the military global alliance is very real with the Russians doing the hard uplifting.”
No corroboration is provided. "live in 2021 to announce" What does that mean?
Spurious, imo.
UK Space command was established in 2021 (April 1, btw) with Godfrey in command.
I think its easy enough to postulate that after Trump establishing US Space force, that Uk Space force was later created and that there is a deeper alliance at work here (behind the scenes), but the notion that somehow "the military" took over at the time of the Biden inauguration seems to have no basis except in theory (aka no tangible or verifiable evidence).
HOWEVER, if Devolution continuity of government was implemented BEFORE the inauguration of Biden, it would mean that certain powers of the executive (potus) were devolved so that Biden in his position no longer has those powers, and that those powers are being held by military segments during the devolution phase until the legitimate government can be reconstituted.
But twisting Walker's words to say "transition TO military power" when clearly they are not, well, we've seen that sort of spin and clickbait mongering before. I don't buy it, myself.
Halper:
"David, david, Maybe what they are doing is taking out some of these people behind the scenes....
Rodriguez:
That's what I was going to get at next. That was going to be my next question to you. .... Is there (sic) bigger moves that we're not aware of behinds the scenes?
Halper:
Absolutely, including things that I'm never specifically told, but I am very intuitive and pick up different things that different people can tell me, and then I put it together....
So.... she's never told specifically, but she can "put it together".
Personally, I have ZERO doubt that Trump implemented some sort of devolution and that there are many things behind the scenes, BUT I see out there all sorts of people who - in my view - abuse that situation in order to raise hopium-fed followings and self benefit by spouting all sorts of things that some people would like to hear, and I contrast those with people who actually do the opposite: aka encourage people to research, investigate, think for themselves, apply healthy logical and skepticism, and up front emphasize when speculation is pure speculation, in order to NOT mislead others.
Many of our favorite insiders I put in the former class - Juan 07, Rodriguez, Stew Peters, Charlie whatsisiname, etc. I put Patel Patriot in the latter class.
Halpers association with all those shysters (my view) is a pretty big blotch on her stories. At best, I think she's a mixed bag and I'm not interested in the pure "belief" approach that a lot of her assertions seem to require.
Dr. Jan Halper AGAIN confirms that Military Tribunals have been and continue to take place. She also confirms:
✅ She holds dual UK/ US DOD Security Clearances.
✅ Because of her clearances, she has a Military contact who feeds her this information.
✅ Her contact confirmed there IS a global Military alliance being spearheaded by Space Force.
✅ The Military told the world on Jan 18, 2021 of a “Peaceful transition to Military Power” on ABC News.
✅ Navy JAG is running the Tribunals.
✅ Many “bigger moves” are being made by the Military behind the scenes.
My research and discernment tells me that Dr. Halper was absolutely tasked with bringing these messages of confirmation and hope to the Patriot community at this time.
Quite frankly, it’s common sense Psychology. Any good Military leader knows that the morale of soldiers and civilians is paramount during a war.
The military tasked truthers and Anons with helping to fight in this 5th Generation Information war.
They have known that as the end nears, people will be weary, concerned and tired.
Does it not make perfect sense that they would have someone with direct, credible Military connections deliver some confirmation to us all?
It does, that's what can make unsubstantiated claims so dangerous. It might lift morale in the short term, but if untrue, or exaggerated, can lead to more damage in the long run.
Treat such claims as data points and take them with a pinch of salt unless they bring receipts.
We have Fake News MSM and everyone crying if reelected President Trump will kill all his political adversaries. Did they believe with treason and Crimes against Humanity they would get a cookie ?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
Why isn't Q telling us these things, would it be a breach of national security?
I think Q's part is done. We clearly have everything we need and have proven to be quite effective.
Q served the purpose. People were told they had more than needed and to quit referring to Q. Very few listened.
I kind of equate Q with Thomas Paine's "Common Sense". "Common Sense" was the most important Patriot pamphlet issued during the Revolution. It woke an entire Nation and created the awareness and resolve to oppose tyranny. I think Q's most important contribution is creating that same awareness and resolve today.
Interesting footnote of History:
Washington had "Common Sense" read to his troops before they crossed the Delaware.
I do this with everything. I can see with my own eyes, though, that the overall tenor and direction of the operation is positive and that progress is being made.
Probably my most reliable gauge for this is the reactions and narratives on MSM. They always tell you what they are afraid of. When they speak of Trump being authoritarian and that he will imprison his political foes, this isnt only projection by them, it is also raw fear that Trump has the receipts and will prosecute traitors.
Also consider the recent murder porn articles on Trump. They seem to be calling out to their mkultra slaves to try a lucky shot since they cant seem to do it with the professionals.
Their problem is we are on to the game. We are no longer NPCs. They cant gaslight us into acting against our own best interests. We realize that Trump arresting traitors is a feature, not a flaw, no matter how hard they try to rebrand traitors into heroes standing strong for "their" Democracy. The absurdity on display every day has done nothing but reinforce the idea that the DC ruling class are all criminal grifters in the least but likely traitorous. 'Fake News' went from the Battle Cry of the Anons to ubiquitous. Theres no escaping the Awakening now.
So I listen to Jan and dont discount what she is saying as I can see a scenario where it is likely happening at some level. But I also wont throw all my eggs in that basket and allow complacency.
IF she is privy to this information from her security clearance is she not then breaking a law by telling people about it? IF these tribunals are happening in secret then they must be classified. So how on earth can she can keep directly telling people classified information without losing her security clearance or arrested?
Also in the video the interview asks her if shes allowed to share this, and she dodges the question. This concerns me.
She seems like a pay-triot to me. Your concern is shared.
I can see potential for her to be a controlled opposition agent. Though that would likely put her as a slow burn operative that ends up being made to look like an unreliable nut job in the end.
Her claims seem like this to the normies who I have heard that have seen her videos. Her info/ideas she spouses could easily backfire for the great awakening if things do not turn out the way she claims.
That is if she is a black hat/controlled & blackhats are claiming ground.
Trump said she was great, so I doubt she's a black hat.
I could be wrong, and I often am, I thought the term was "Fantastic", which is generally considered good by society. Though there are some things that are too fantastical to be believed.
He also praised the accomplishments of RBG & while I agree she was a very accomplished woman, & it can be sad to see loss of life, I don't believe that many of her supreme court decisions & positions were great.
I am not certain which way to lean with her, though she certainly is a catalyst of some sort.
Read this and decide. Notice how Fake News MSM has been claiming if president Trump is elected he was going to kill all his political adversaries ? Did they think with Treason and Crimes against humanity they were going to earn a cookie for a reward ?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
Holding a security clearance does not mean one knows or can find out about a thing
Compartmentalization
She’s full of shit
Yes
Control.
And Dems do this shit all the freaking time.
I believe that this woman is a raving nut bag. If she knew it was true and blabbed about it she would be black bagged and never seen again.
Or she’s a chaos agent, Judas Goat gatekeeper - ultimately Masonic - blabbing pre-ordained limited hangout content for obfuscation and/or shits and giggles. She’s likely working from a script.
And this is where we’re at with all of them, anyone speaking counter to The Narratives.™️ They’re either genuine whistleblowers, loony-tunes dingbats, or narcissistic psychopaths getting a kick out of being puppeteered.
I like her. I get how raw everyone is about being lied to by pretty much everybody, but what happens when truth shows up at last? We doubt it, and we shit all over it so we don't look like fools once again.
Whatever. My feeling is that she's bringing what she's been given the okay to bring. She's clearly not an idiot, and she's also clearly in support of DJT and the White Hat Plan.
How can you Dr. Jan haters all forget that nobody gets wind of what the military is up to until it's all done?
Amen, I remember President Trump did give her a shout out on Truth Social.
That old saying, “arrest or gtfo”
Without receipts and sauce, they will be doubted.
Well said.
I don't know much about her, but everything seems credible.
It would be nice of there was some type of Q proof or even a new drop that could somehow be discerned as validation of her credibility.
Equally as true as your assessment is the possibility that she is a fraud... and the irony is that this effort she is supposedly confirming for us is what taught us to be skeptical. So, we need a "Halper of suace" ... haha, get it?
Will this help ?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
That does help. Thanks. I was aware of this article... it doesn't go as far as I would like though--it could just be that her deductions are on the mark and that's what Trump confirmed.
If Q could just email me directly with irrefutable proof that she is legit, then Iwill be happy : )
Q stated no outside communications.
Yeah, I was just being silly
No problem.
She has found a great way to sell books and content. Nobody knew who she was prior to q. Did q ever give credibility to her?
Trump himself did when he re-truthed her stuff. Good enough for me. Don't need to hear it from Q who has gone silent for >1 year.
Exactly! How many endorsements is enough? Trump's is the best endorsement anyway.
Good point, but trump trusted alot of enemies too.
She reminds me of the Sidney Powell interview hype.
Lynn wood. I’ve been attacked for poopooing her but why would wh’s let the enemy know the next move? She’s a larp. Shill! If there is a plan, according to q, only 5 know it. 3 military and two civilian. The rest may be playing a part but that part is to inject disinfo. Never interfere with the enemy while it is destroying itself. The plan is an awakening that cannot be stopped. Once awake, the populace will demand Justice. Pray. Trust in God. And be patient while the enemy exposes itself for what it is. It is an invisible enemy. Christ said, “come out of her my people!” The great harlot is the beast system that was set up as the rejuvenated Roman Empire. 1871 saving Israel for last!
Lin Wood is a man, pede....
I know. Bad grammar. I was comparing.
Trump himself did.
Trump also endorsed dr oz
Not even close to the same thing.
I love that people are staying frosty w/respect to Jan.
...but it is hilarious how many frens here seem more intrigued by stuff like qofficial.net, Ingersoll Lockwood, usdebtclock, or George over someone directly and publicly validated by Trump. 🤣
Amen, I have noticed that also. I remember when President Trump acknowledged her on Truth Social. If not mistaken someone posted that here a while back.
Yup right here:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c1zPz4it/realdonaldtrump-dr-jan-halperhay/c/
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/110845227764397486
Thank you for the links.
why would somebody sooooooo connected with the UK AND US security services be on the internet spouting about it?
Fucking bullshit she is.
I cant believe any of you fall for her shite!
I was okay with her when she only hinted at it, but now she is directly telling people that it's happening and freely telling people classified information would land her in hot water. She also dodges the question hard when the interviewer asked her if she is allowed to share this information. Something ain't right with this.
She had her brief time in the limelight but as you rightly say something ain't right!
Is she the female B. Fulford?
Ha sounds like it! I like your thinking ;) !
It has been said, "A starving person will goggle poison."
And even then, she admits she doesnt know and is just putting pieces together.
Dude idk why this concept is so hard for people on this board. It’s obvious they have been happening. John Mcains daughter and John kasich both said he was executed and that was a LONG time ago. You think they just magically stopped tribunals after one person? Hell no. I would wager most of the evil corrupt people we know of are already dead.
Also no one said we would witness executions. And also where do you think all the loud obnoxious assholes went? They used to be in the news near daily and you don’t hear a peep hardly. (DiCaprio, Obamas, Clinton’s, bush’s, etc.) they literally dominated the news cycle and now you see them allegedly a couple times a year and usually never up close.
I dont' recall DiCaprio dominating news cycles. Only ever heard of him doing some climate change bs.
Yeah DiCaprio isn’t a good example but the climate change voices have been quieter too. Even others like Oprah, Ellen, and big names that were around a good bit have basically gone silent.
And Tom Hanks and his wife just got their Greek citizenship.
Daddy Bush was executed. His family was no where in sight when he died. The only person with him was James Baker, and he probably pulled the plug.
His term was “fantastic”. Have a look at the various definitions of that word in the dictionary.
Good catch. It could very well be taken as (Unrealistic.)
ty THIS makes sense
And which direction is the witch hunt? Could “masterpiece” be sarcastic? If it’s fake news but Trump doesn’t want to say something explicit to discredit it outright at the moment so that Jan’s team (which by her description would be part of the current Biden/Obama administration) gets an opportunity to spin its web more, what kind of post might he write to get anons’ attention on it?
The Q drops give a lot of insight into moves and countermoves.
He is specifically citing her views on the election theft.
Agreed, her clearance credential source is literally “trust me bro”.
yea i used to believe her. now i dont. plus, nino always gets played....
This would apply if her detractors are correct that she’s an anti-patriot operator too, however
Interesting & good observations.
If she is an op to undermine truth, she's going to get no flak or almost no flak from the propaganda machine.
Appears many people missed this story.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
Here is a link .
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
@realdonaldtrump
Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes is fantastic. Everyone has got to watch her interview on election fraud with the poor sap who got taken apart by her. Thank you Don Jr. for putting this masterpiece out for the public to see. WITCH HUNT! Aug 06, 2023, 6:19 PM https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110845227764397486
"Fantastic"
based on fantasy (see FANTASY entry 1 sense 2) : not real
conceived or seemingly conceived by unrestrained fancy
so extreme as to challenge belief : UNBELIEVABLE
Thank you for the link. Here is another link.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
No relation to Stephan Halper?
Or maybe Jan Hammer
I am not sure Brother. Her mannerism reminds me of Clare M. Lopez.
Hopium dealer of the year
Im a hopium addict so it's not a bad thing, for me at least kek
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
I’ll believe it when I see klaus Schwab, Obummer, Fauci and Liz Cheney swinging at the end of a rope.
So us watching the trials and confession in 8 hour loops for 10 days will be the proof. Remember who informed us.
I file her under 'follow around and find out'. It was a big deal that Trump praised her GB News interview, which they now pretend never happened. Plus she's not trying to sell alien sexdust-powered flash drives or whatever they were like Simon Parkes.
The only way she could reveal this is she was give the okay. If she was not, they would have silenced her by now. Saying all that, until I see DJT say it is going on I will be a hopeful skeptic.
President Trump did give her a shout out on Truth Social a while back.
"hopeful sceptic" is what I am too.
On a previous post of one her videos, which was later taken down by a mod, I wrote it would be nice if we had some kind of proof of just one tribunal. If Navy JAG is doing this , where is it being done? GITMO? On ships? If this is the case, can’t we track where all ships are, there movements, their mission?
This is good story for the 48 hour rule. If necessary, a 168 hour rule. Maybe even a 720 hour rule.
No Name’s tribunal was obviously done out of sight if one happened at all.
Do I want tribunals to happen? Yes! But I also feel that all instruments of justice should be public, just for the sake of being accountable. Also, all of us in the cause would like to see justice meted out and there are still normies needing to be red pilled. Seeing evidence of Hillary’s involvement in U1, or seeing evidence submitted against Obama and Biden , especially crimes against children would unite the 94 to 96%.
Why would the daughter let slip they killed him ?
How do you avoid a major civil war with a Nation deeply divided ? Do you hold trials and convictions in secret while exposing this evil to the world and waking people up ?
How in the 10 days are we watching their trials and confessions if they are being rounded up ?
With a informed world while there will be violence from fanatics but how many more lives were saved because of secrecy and exposing this evil to the world ?
Reflect back to HCQ and Ivermectin and the response back then to today. Those who listened were saved from the harm from the Jab. This showed us exactly where we were globally back then. Not only are we avoiding a major civil war but a global one also.
Good point.
That question jumped out at me when I read the post back then.
I’m also conflicted by this. Are the tribunals going on now as we all wish. If so, who is being tried and what are the charges? What evidence is being presented? If found guilty, what is the sentence and where will it be carried out? OR Is this a big fraud?
For this leak I suspect they are done with the Big Shots. The fleas are possibly be collected now. Think about the funerals of those we were made aware of and wrinkled flags on coffins.
https://rumble.com/v2zwtyi-former-army-vets-brilliant-concise-3-minute-law-summary-proof-djt-is-still-.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=10
https://rumble.com/vd3c8r-national-guard-soldiers-turn-their-back-on-bidens-motorcade-as-it-heads-to-.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=5
https://rumble.com/vdcf0h--this-is-why-biden-is-not-potus-3.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=6
https://rumble.com/v2h956k-bidens-inauguration-was-actually-his-funeral...-pay-close-attention.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=12
We can't believe a word of this. It's all I said so, so it's TRUE. I hope nobody falls for this nonsense
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
say Hi to the FARM.
I’ll sit on the fence for now, but also how many shills are on here to shoot down any hopium?
Appears President Trump posted her comments in the past on Truth Social.
Once.
Also, in direct reference to her arguments views on "election fraud".
The Trump truth essentially praises how she "took the poor sap apart", with that emphasis.
I'm a skeptic. Besides, how can you say "confirms"? She asserts once again, but where are the receipts? No receipts, it's not a confirmation, but an assertion.
BASED
You appear to have missed this.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
Fake News MSM crying about president trump being reelected he will kill all his political adversaries. They are crying for a genuine reason this time. Treason and Crimes against Humanity and sex with children come with no Statute of limitations.
Lakota, you've posted this link in the comment section TWELVE times. Are you sure you're not a little obsessed an infatuated with The Halper phenomena?
Q did not give us inside secret information. Q used teh socratic meathod to get people to think and question using open sources of information, in order to put the pieces together and join the dots.
Question: What benefits do you see Halper as conferring on the Awakening movement?
Congratulations you counted each and every one of them. Now ask who really is infatuated ? Projection time ? How many times have we repeated information tp help those just waking up ? Do you prefer to help them or keep the information from them ? How does that help us to help them ? Please explain.
Um, noticing that you've posted that link again and again and again, and then casually glancing to see actually how many times isn't anything more than looking at a fact.
I did it because such prodigious spamming of a link very rarely happens in any posts I see on GAW, and when it does, the OP might reiterate their point 3 or 4 or 5 times, but nothing like what you've done here. I myself have done it a few times, posted something I thought very relevant to clarify or direct a commenter to my post in some direction, but never more than a few times, and on those occasions, readers have pointed out the slightly obsessive nature of the act.
Perhaps I don't read your posts or comments closely enough, but you seem uncharacteristically personalized and dare I say bordering on passive/aggressive in your commenting here. "congratulations".
Jeepers. Sorry if my comments or questions offend you. They are just comments.
I am so happy you love yourself. Your words have no power until I decide, now go back to the farm and know you are not able to even be recycled. Team Biden is a no go.
Ok. Thanks for sharing.
May your path be strewn with blessings, peace and love.
I am in Gods hands . Good to go.
Here's the full interview. It's worth listening to as she addresses a lot of the issues people raise about her.
https://rumble.com/v3xq8jp-jan-halper-hayes-teaches-nino-patience-ninos-corner.html
She may be right. If she is spilling secrets about what is happening behind closed doors, she should find herself before a judge.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
Yes, we all got excited when she told us about 600 some odd plane loads of gold.
Remember the photo in Q drop from Ft Knox ?
I like her the same as buying a lottery ticket. The dream is worth it.
✅ The Military told the world on Jan 18, 2021 of a “Peaceful transition to Military Power” on ABC News.
Anyone have a link to this?
I do not have that link but I do recall hearing this.
I haven't seen a LARP this deep in a while. Thanks. This is the kind of shit people screenshot and share to say "omg look how crazed they anon is?!😱"
The people did this in the past with Noah until they were treading water also. Sometimes truth is stranger then fiction.
Tribunals are taking place, and none of the families of the tried have spoken about their missing loved ones. Only Dr Jan.
Funny that I remember NoNames daughter claim they killed him ???
Q confirmed that No Name was executed. Any other confirmations? So, how many executions have taken place? Why in secret? What would be the public response if they learned that all in secret, 'white hats' have been executing folks?
There was another operation that spread the gitmo executions etc, etc, etc narrative, which, when it first appeared, some actually used the argument that this operation has been tasked with X agenda. namely to 'leak' the real information out in order to prepare for public exposure to 'upcoming reveals'.
That operation functioned 2.8 years ago, directly after Jan 2021, and was called real raw news. The level of bogusness was off the charts.
If you think Halper is a realiable source, then make the argument why, including with reference to the Q method that is the backbone of the awakening.
I generally like your posts, but the attachment to "halper or bust" seems .... less than well founded, imo.
So explain to me this. How when all things getting shut down. We are supposed to watch their trials and confessions while they are supposedly arresting them during that time frame ?
The answer was always there.
Thanks Lakota.
I can make no sense of what you are saying after "so explain this to me".
Thank you for letting me know this is above your pay grade. Hopefully your tomorrows will be brighter then your todays.
You too. Be well.
Thanks for responding.
Thank you and no problem.
Oh look it's "JanHereToHelp"
There's always plausible deniability.... maybe she's telling the truth... maybe she's full of shit... maybe BOTH.
hahah. Yes, "john here to help" was it?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
Jan Halper was part of Trump's transition team. Does the photo below seem to indicate Trump is slightly excited to be in her presence? Little clues like this have meaning.
https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Iysq_vZSNdsr__TBy3zV9gHaEK&pid=Api&P=0&h=180
She works for the DOD. Trump is reposting memes that indicate he is Commander in Chief. Trump has reposted interviews with Jan Halper. I do not think Trump would go out of his way to promote Halper if she was a larp.
You have been told this is a movie which tells me most likely everything we have been waiting for has already happened. NCSWIC most likely means, it can't be stopped because it has already taken place.
hmmm.
Thats' reaching, imo.
How many photos has DJT taken with people including those that have worked with him, etc, where he's grinning and showing a thumbs up. I'd guess literally thousands. (Recall he shook the hands of a thousand or so military academy graduates?) Do they all have meaning like this?
Do we have direct corroborative evidence of that? I've not seen any. I'm open to seeing it if it exists. Note4 also, she says directly "Worked at the DOD here in the UK" Past tense.
I know of only one. If there are more, I'd like to see them. As far as I know, only 1 retruth, in which he praised her interaction aka interview about 'election fraud'.
Well, that's pure opinion. I don't agree, myself. NCSWIC very well maps on to game theory that the game board is or has been structured so as to define the ultimate outcome. As in Chess, where the winning player may well know exactly that nothing can stop his checkmate from coming, but the opponent doesn't know yet and the checkmate itself hasn't happened.
"Trump is slightly excited to be in her presence"
That was a question, I was asking for an opinion, and you gave it. In my opinion, he does seem excited. You say he shook thousands of hands, did they all work on his transition team?
Works for the DOD?
Ya, you could be correct, maybe she is lying. Thats why Trump reposted her video, to show everyone she is a liar. If she was lying about her DOD position do you think Trump would give her the time of day?
"he praised her interaction aka interview about 'election fraud'."
I think that interview covered several topics, I do remember her mentioning 650 planes with gold. I think if there was any inaccurate information in that interview Trump would not have reposted it.
NCSWIC
My rationalization is pure opinion, what is yours? The same. It is a well settled opinion that "no name" was executed for treason. No one from the Trump admin has ever confirmed this fact yet it is a theory that is agreed upon.
How many others have met the same fate? The current Joe Biden looks very different from the old Joe Biden, could the old Joe be 6 feet under? Maybe he has been shot, like Trump suggested many times.
How many times have we seen Hillary's body double filling in for her? Do you know Hillary is still alive? Maybe all the current video of Hillary was pre-recorded before her tribunal and execution and they roll the pre-recorded video when it is appropriate. I know Hillary's pic on her Twitter page of her sitting with a black child hasn't changed in 5 years. https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton
The wayback machine says she has had that same pic up since Oct of 2018. It is such an odd picture, you would think she would have taken 2 seconds to place something newer in the last 5 years, doncha think. She has 3 grandchildren, yet she chooses a pic of some black child, kinda telling, she isn't around any longer.
I am sure they have evidence of Hillary's crimes against children, it came out in an IG report on the Clinton Foundation. Do you think they would not prosecute, let her walk away so she could harm more children? The evidence on Weiner laptop made many of detectives vomit and coincidently many of them are dead now. Evidence that revolting and they set her free? I don't think so.
Maybe that is why Q called it a movie, you are watching actors, the originals are long gone and thus, NCSWIC.
Thanks for your detailed and passionate reply. Appreciated!
"Trump is slightly excited to be in her presence"
Yes, you are correct. You did frame it as a question.
I guess a more direct reply for me would have been "I don't think the photo indicates that Trump is ESPECIALLY excited to be in her presence". Sorry if that wasn't clear.
OK. You may well be right! I thought the photo was a bit small to see much detail tho. A larger resolution would have been nice, but maybe there aren't many of those around. EDIT: I found a much better resolution one here
Obviously no. But my point is, having a photo of Halper-Hayes standing next to Donald Trump with him flashing a big grin and a thumbs up is, for me, nothing that seems in any way out of the ordinary. Just as a photo of Trump in proximity to Epstein doesn't indicate that Trump and Epstein were working in cahoots or that Trump was compromised by Epstein.
Also, I speculate that he's probably done many of such photos, with members of the transition team, or any other team, that he's worked with on various projects or campaigns, etc. What makes this one special, except for the idea that "it means something special"? Empirically, is it special?
But obviously that's subjective. You think the photo says something special. I don't. Different opinions. Nothing wrong with that, right?
I guess I can see that you take a LOT of little things and that you weave them together to form a much larger picture that to you seems quite consistent. "Little clues like this have meaning."
However, personally, I'm wary of extensive theories that have (in my view) an over-emphasis on pure reasoning and conjecture as the basis for elaborate explanations, and think its important to consistently check the ideas the more one moves along.
I mean, isn't a theory really only as good as far it can be tested against actual empirical evidence? If a theory can stand up to rigorous questioning and eliminate any alternative explanations for the observed phenomena, then it's good. If alternative explanations are possible, doesn't ignoring them simply weaken the theory instead of strengthening them?
Theories that are strengthened through ignoring alternative explanations become dogma. We, when we hold to them regardless of alternative explanations, become dogmatic. Dogmatism is a trap very easily fallen in to by those who overly focus on their own reasoning because of held but (unrecognized) beliefs or bias confirmation, etc.
"Works for the DOD?" "Do we have direct corroborative evidence of that?"
For me, that is not the point. Maybe I'm just a reformed Reaganite? (dis)Trust, but verify? I don't necessarily think that she's lying, but she has made a LOT of claims as far as I know, and I personally think that corroborative evidence - factual and empirical evidence that can be verified - is important in establishing the truth. But maybe that's just me?
The more claims, the greater the relevance or need for some sort of evidence backing at least some of them up. It's certainly possible to develop elaborate theories, hard held beliefs and passionate convictions based entirely on reasoning, speculation and inference, etc., but my own approach is that that evidence and facts are also very important when it comes to establishing truth, which is what any of us, I assume, would want our theories, beliefs and convictions, etc, to be based on.
One of my favorite Q quotes is the one on freedom of thought (emphasis added).
Yes. That's true. I guess that I'm simply questioning the reasoning behind "NCSWIC most likely means, it can't be stopped because it has already taken place"
As in, why does NCSWIC most likely mean = [X]?
I think that's a highly subjective conclusion, not very objective, and I gave an example to show another very plausible explanation (in my view) of what NCSWIC could mean. So why does it 'most likely' mean (it already happened)?
I'm not saying you cannot have or express your own opinion. I just saying I find it highly subjective in this case, and I wanted to emphasize that.
I don't know if you are doing it, but I'm wary if it seems like someone is conflating their own opinion with a fact, or their belief with a fact, because if they then carry on extensive reasoning and argument AS IF that opinion is a fact, they can get further and further away from the recognition that what they are doing is speculating and they end up conflating their entire belief system with .... fact.
I mean, I think I can sense that you have a very firm and powerful conviction about your own conclusions, but a lot of it seems like very subjective reasoning to me, and that makes me wary and also makes me want to question whether the dozens of tiny premises on which the bigger picture is based are actually reasonable, or better yet, verifiable through evidence.
Thanks again for sharing your perspective on all that. I do thinks its food for thought and there is some good reasoning there. I don't mean my comments or questions as a personal attack, and I'm grateful you've elaborated your thinking.
It seems to me that we take a certain set of facts and reason them out along very different lines. I think that could be an advantage if understood from the viewpoint that very often, it is contrastive perspectives that highlight little understood aspects.
On the other hand, maybe you just see everything in perfect clarity and I'm just seeing 1/3 of it, and so I doubt your explanations! I mean, that's possible too, right?
In any case, thanks again for the response and discussion.
Exactly, The truth is being exposed to the world. This truth will bring us together. Notice the changing of the old guard in progress and people taking back their country .
Has anyone noticed that she looks a bit like the real life version of the cartoon girl used in a lot of the memes?
...the following ' comments ' are being watched very acutely for indications on perceived reactions on upcoming reveals
I agree.
Wow there are a lot of doomers and shills commenting on this video, which tells me she’s 100% spot on.
There are a lot of level-headed people who have learned something over the past few years and want to see a shred of evidence along with big claims.
Agreed anon.
Anyone who has risen from obscurity into the limelight on the lamestream paytriot circuit should certainly be scrutinized. She's the same as Juan the con. Regurgitating shit we already know and/or suspect while alluding to inside sources.
She's a sophist by definition. People choose their own bread & circuses.
I think you're mistaking critical thinking and healthy skepticism with 'dooming'. And you may well be confusing 'hopium' with actual hopermectin. There's a reason why the expression 'hopium' rings with and is derived from 'opium'. It's more about the narcotic impact of false or ungrounded news than it is about fact-based, empirically sound and reasoned information.
President Trump gave her a shout out a while back on Truth Social.
You have to listen with discernment. The fact of her having clearances has no relevance to what she is reporting. The factual allegations being reported are taken from open sources, so there is no disclosure of classified information or spreading of falsehoods. Anything else would be her speculations as to what may be happening "behind the scenes," which she qualifies as speculation (albeit intuitive and informed).
It is good to go, for what it is. It may not go as far as you want. The witch-hunt cavils are meritless.
A little parable: After many trials, Jonah comes to Nineveh to preach God's warning. The crowd is interested...but some with reservations begin to exclaim: "His hair is not white enough. Has he talked with God? He's not carrying the two tablets! Can he touch his staff to rock and make water spring forth? Can he part the Tigris River? What was he before he came to sermonize? Is this a scheme to collect alms? Is he a Satanist, telling lies?" Jonah has no answer, and sadly departs.
Fake News MSM has been crying that president Trump gets reelected he will kill all of his political adversaries. They forget to mention Treason and Crimes against Humanity. Were they expecting to get a cookie for a reward ? Here is a link.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/must-watch-pres-trump-amplifies-dr-jan-halper/
Let's do a little myth busting analysis, shall we?
When questioned RE: the information she was going to share (0:50), the interviewer asks "you're allowed to share this?" to which she responds, in a somewhat protesting tone, not looking at him, but with closed eyes:
"ma...uh... this is my UK military... wait tll you see... hear what I share"
At 1:53, quoting the text sent to her, she says (reads)
But he doesn't say that at all. He says the smooth transition OF military power.
here the direct source:
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/News/video/head-dc-national-guard-discusses-inauguration-security-75318914
In the full interview, Walker says he is there to assist the police force, and the secret service. "we're trained for civil disturbance.."
Walker was at the time commander in chief and other roles with "the Joint Forces Headquarters, Washington, District of Columbia" since 2012 (Obama administration era).
Who controls Washington? Does anyone believe that a Washington based commander for more than 8 years would be anything but a swamp rat?
Another interview on the same day confirms that he and what he's doing is exactly what it looks like: taking care of Washington National Guard for the (fraudulent) "transition of power" from the Trump Administration to the Biden (illegitimate) administration, aka "Inauguration security".
https://www.msnbc.com/craig-melvin/watch/-we-re-not-taking-any-chances-d-c-national-guard-commanding-general-on-inauguration-security-99636293830
Walker:
But those who latch on to Halper's claims here are doing nothing but repeating the hype that surrounded those days, when so many who knew "the inside scoop" said that in fact the military was taking over, and that all that stuff was just for show, etc, because now the military is going to put the black hats down.
To me, this directly calls into question Halper's claims, because the simple statement of the Washington (Swamp central) top military commander said "smooth transition OF military power" and yet, its presented as "To military power".
Prior to this, she reads (quote): "“air vice marshal paul godfrey went live 2021 to announce UK space force and the military global alliance is very real with the Russians doing the hard uplifting.”
No corroboration is provided. "live in 2021 to announce" What does that mean?
Spurious, imo.
UK Space command was established in 2021 (April 1, btw) with Godfrey in command.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Space_Command
I think its easy enough to postulate that after Trump establishing US Space force, that Uk Space force was later created and that there is a deeper alliance at work here (behind the scenes), but the notion that somehow "the military" took over at the time of the Biden inauguration seems to have no basis except in theory (aka no tangible or verifiable evidence).
HOWEVER, if Devolution continuity of government was implemented BEFORE the inauguration of Biden, it would mean that certain powers of the executive (potus) were devolved so that Biden in his position no longer has those powers, and that those powers are being held by military segments during the devolution phase until the legitimate government can be reconstituted.
But twisting Walker's words to say "transition TO military power" when clearly they are not, well, we've seen that sort of spin and clickbait mongering before. I don't buy it, myself.
Halper:
Rodriguez:
Halper:
So.... she's never told specifically, but she can "put it together".
Personally, I have ZERO doubt that Trump implemented some sort of devolution and that there are many things behind the scenes, BUT I see out there all sorts of people who - in my view - abuse that situation in order to raise hopium-fed followings and self benefit by spouting all sorts of things that some people would like to hear, and I contrast those with people who actually do the opposite: aka encourage people to research, investigate, think for themselves, apply healthy logical and skepticism, and up front emphasize when speculation is pure speculation, in order to NOT mislead others.
Many of our favorite insiders I put in the former class - Juan 07, Rodriguez, Stew Peters, Charlie whatsisiname, etc. I put Patel Patriot in the latter class.
Halpers association with all those shysters (my view) is a pretty big blotch on her stories. At best, I think she's a mixed bag and I'm not interested in the pure "belief" approach that a lot of her assertions seem to require.