A non sequitur fallacy is a sequence of reasoning that misses or skips over a key part, making the conclusion invalid (even if the premises are true). For example:
NIKKI HAYLEY IS ON BOEING BOARD, THERE FORE SHE HAS SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR BOEING MAX PROBLEMS OR CRASES..
There's no suggestion of cause and effect here. At no point did I indicate Nikki Haley caused the Boeing 737 to crash. All I did was point out that Boeing had her on their board, which indicates to me that Boeing really is not into air safety as much as they'd like people to think. The fact that it happen to be Nikki Haley was a shake-my-head coincidence.
A non sequitur fallacy is a sequence of reasoning that misses or skips over a key part, making the conclusion invalid (even if the premises are true). For example: NIKKI HAYLEY IS ON BOEING BOARD, THERE FORE SHE HAS SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR BOEING MAX PROBLEMS OR CRASES..
DID YOU GRADUATE FROM 6TH GRADE? YET?
So if the board of directors in not responsible for the company who is?
There's no suggestion of cause and effect here. At no point did I indicate Nikki Haley caused the Boeing 737 to crash. All I did was point out that Boeing had her on their board, which indicates to me that Boeing really is not into air safety as much as they'd like people to think. The fact that it happen to be Nikki Haley was a shake-my-head coincidence.
Username checks out