Trump Truth on presidential immunity - Answer from Federal Appeals Court Hearing, in Washington, D.C. is YES! - The Great Awakening

Trump Truth on presidential immunity - Answer from Federal Appeals Court Hearing, in Washington, D.C. is YES! (media.greatawakening.win) LET'S GOOoOoooo!!!

posted 1 year ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid 1 year ago by UnvaxxedUnafraid +273 / -0

64 comments download

64 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (64)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– KeepForgetting_PW 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

This feels way more like a big L for the country.

Getting s/elected shouldn’t put you above the law.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– RisingTidePod 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Right? So is Trump trying to set a precedent that Biden has immunity for anything he does in the next 12 months?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– 5547 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Nope because hidenbiden is not president.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– RisingTidePod 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I think Trump's own TS post at the top of this page clearly says otherwise.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– KeepForgetting_PW 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Great, so once that’s proven publicly, after he’s been dead for years, he can be tried for his crimes. 🙄

But even if I that is true, being president shouldn’t give you legal immunity. It should make you even more susceptible to legal scrutiny if anything.

Legal immunity only appeals to criminals.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q