New Lab-made Chinese 100% Death Rate In Mice Virus Just Dropped - And it infects the BRAIN... likely turning people into 'zombies?'
(media.patriots.win)
🤢 WTF Is Wrong With Scientists!🤮
Just to be clear: A virus with a 100% death rate does not last very long, nor spread very wide. The victims die, so they are not walking around, spreading the virus. What you get, is a vicious little pocket of death, and then nothing.
That's correct if they die quickly, if they take weeks to die, the virus could spread far. Either way I think the point of this virus is release it and use it to scare people into getting vaccines, not killing billions with the virus, that's the vaccines job.
Yes, but they don't even need to release or even possess such a virus... All they need to do is convince the populace that it exists and is spreading.
But if it turns them into zombies .... zombies can last a long time.... but they're really slow, right?
Can you kill them with fruit? I scored pretty high in that game....
LOL
Great comment. That's why the virologist in the video from the other day estimated deaths at around 20%.
It's like that Plauge Inc game in the play store. The most lethal viruses die and you can't spread them too far because the hosts die before the virus can be transmitted
My strategy for that game is to make the virus as low key as possible so it’s hardly noticed and then evolve it into the next plague. That way by the time people notice, too late to start countermeasures
High death rate equals low transmission.
Higher the transmission ability the lower the death rate. But hey….. I’m not the science.
But you state the wisdom pretty well.
The main ingredient in this wee academic deception is fear, and being transparent about only certain things, like hiding the fact, in plain view, that they are mucking around with computer models and some filthy brews - against gain-of-function bans. So, they play little shell-games with 'other' countries. Logic such as the general knowledge-level understanding that high mortality = need for a 'spreader', because humans will be dead, so the thing will not spread from human to human.
The ramifications are that an evil actor would need to disperse the virus, which has its own issues, i.e. method of undetected delivery. Or, there would be a bat-bite scare if it was proved that these are now deadly- although I imagine that such things can be managed, as in: don't go in bat-caves.
The fact that this paper has been published in a journal means it is supposedly peer-reviewed, but that has its own managerial failures. Peer-reviewers look for all sorts of things, but neglect others, such as , say, ethics. they are also lowly paid, so could be open for a little bit of, shall se say, fragrant grease. There is a secondary benefit, for those with deep pockets, that populations, or politicians or what-have-you will get scared.