Um, the Founders knew that government can get out of control and created the Second Amendment for JUST SUCH A PURPOSE. The word "militia" is right there in the 2nd Amendment wording. So congress-critters want to prohibit what the Second Amendment encourages?
As I have stated several times previously - we all have to keep in mind, any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is not a law. This comes from Marbury v. Madison (https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/marbury-v-madison) ... “A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.”
Especially when that “law” comes from individuals not elected, but placed there. We are under illegitimate government and nothing they pass is legal in any sense.
Um, the Founders knew that government can get out of control and created the Second Amendment for JUST SUCH A PURPOSE. The word "militia" is right there in the 2nd Amendment wording. So congress-critters want to prohibit what the Second Amendment encourages?
As I have stated several times previously - we all have to keep in mind, any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is not a law. This comes from Marbury v. Madison (https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/marbury-v-madison) ... “A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.”
Especially when that “law” comes from individuals not elected, but placed there. We are under illegitimate government and nothing they pass is legal in any sense.