I wonder if there was anything other than the territorial information he was talking about, in the folder. It was rather ceremoniously presented, don’t you think? Files on the election? Killary’ s e-mails?
Also, wouldn’t it be cool if this interview was actually one of two, and number two airs without fan fair, so the MSM/DS couldn’t retaliate?
Just thoughts.
Duplicate of a comment I left in the Putin interview Summary thread, but was buried at the bottom:
I had a thought come to me this morning after being sleep deprived and waking up from a wild dream. I remembered Hillary calling Tucker a puppy dog and useful idiot. Then I remembered dog comms. Then I thought more about the disappointment I had last night watching how Tucker handled the most important interview potentially of his life. Like a dog on command. Like he was working for Fox News (controlled opposition). Maybe he is just a bone head, like I theorized hours ago.
Maybe not. Maybe he really is a controlled agent, leading us all down a rainbow road that leads to a stale pile of horse shit. If the DS was losing control, what better way to gain back a lot of control than use one of the most popular right wing pundits to do their bidding? He needs more credibility. Let's act like Fox News couldn't control him anymore. He gets fired for sharing too much truth and speaking his mind. Yes. Then give him a few zingers that will rally the awakened and make them think he possibly was just an oblivious bone head that is just now waking up and learning the things they learned these past few years. Yes. Then we will all pretend to freak out while anons are jizzing in their pants because he's interviewing Putin. And then Tucker conducted himself like he did last night. No different than a CNN employee. Cut him (Putin) off every time he gets close to saying something interesting, try to mock him while not outright mocking him, and try to get a good sound bite we can use to air on CNN and MSNBC to get the sheep fuel to fight back against the red-pilled (Do you see God's work when you....?). It was almost like he was trying to get him to say something violent or silly to make Putin look like a jackass.
Maybe I'm off by a country mile, but I was so taken back by what I saw that I can't find another way to interpret what I saw and where my thoughts led. Therefore, I personally can't discount the possibility that he is working for [them] and trying to get some of us to lose faith or just knock us off a trail we were too hot on. He recently went on Russell Brand (huge platform for awakened), he knows what truthers talk about and want to know about. He is a diligent man, yet didn't ask about biolabs, didn't ask about the Steele Dossier, DNC servers, purposely avoided bringing up Obama and Hillary, etc. He smells bad to me, very bad. I won't be clicking on his website until he drops the Assange interview, which I will watch with everything I fear in mind.
I agree that Tucker (who was called out by Putin for being a supposed “history” scholar) looked absolutely idiotic in the interview. Overall I sense Tucker wanted very specific answers to will Russia assert more aggressively especially to neighboring territories. I have to say I thought Tuckers cutting him off was quite unprofessional. However I do believe Russia has a clear message in the history. And it ties completely together at the end when Putin has admittance that they are in essentially a civil war. But his message which may not be understood for years is the United States is also on this current trajectory… our culture is constantly being changed, our history erased and rewritten and look at us now, on the verge of what no one wants to see… a civil war. His message was clear to me, and the history lesson as Russia sees it important as most American educated children no nothing about the history of the Russians