I have been reading the Geneva Bible--the Bible that the pilgrims brought with them to America. It predates the King James Bible by roughly 50 years and the KJV translators made ample use of the Geneva Bible. Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but in Chapter 9 is the discussion of the blowing of the 5th trumpet. (I'm standardizing the spelling here because the Geneva Bible has no J's, the u's are v's, the s's sometimes look like f's, etc.)
-
And there came out of the smoke Locusts upon the earth; and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power. [Like the sting of a needle maybe?]
-
And it was commanded them, that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree: but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads. [a footnote for this verse regarding the men in question says: "That is, the infidels whom Satan blindeth with the efficacy of error." (Interesting word choice there: "efficacy" of error, since "efficacy" is a word generally used now in relation to medicine. And we certainly saw a lot of people blinded by MSM and the whole COVID puppeteers who certainly seem to be working for Satan)]
-
And to them was commanded that they should not kill them, but that they should be vexed five months, and that their pain should be as the pain that cometh of a scorpion, when he hath stung a man. [one of the footnotes for this verse: "The elect for a certain space and at times are in troubles: for the grasshoppers endure but from April to September, which is five months." Another footnote regarding the sting: "For at the beginning, the sting of their conscience once seemeth as nothing, but except they soon seek remedy, they perish." This reminds me of all the discussion of venom and other poisons being in the vaccines.]
-
Therefore in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it, and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.
-
And the form of the locusts was like unto horses prepared unto battle, and on their heads were, as it were, crowns, like unto gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. [Crown like "corona"? Faces like men like manmade maybe?]
-
And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions. [Hair like the blood clots maybe?]
-
And they had habbergions [a type of chainmail armor apparently], like to the habbergions of iron: and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots when many horses run into battle.
-
And they had tails like unto scorpions and there were stings in their tails & their power was to hurt men five months. [Footnote on stings in this one: "To infect & kill with their venomous doctrine." The Geneva Bible translators were seeing this all as allegory, but what if it was maybe also more literal than they imagined?]
-
And they have a King over them, which is the Angel of the bottomless pit, whose name is Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek he is named Apollyon. [Footnote for this verse for the word "Angel": "That is, destroyer, which is Antichrist, the Pope, king of hypocrites & Satan's ambassador." The pilgrims where very early protestants, so they weren't fans of the Catholic Pope.]
-
One woe is past, and behold, yet two woes come after this.
-
The the sixth Angel blew the trumpet & I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden alter, which is before God,
-
Saying to the sixth Angel, which had the trumpet, Loose the four Angels, which are bound in the great river Euphrates. [Footnote on this: "Meaning the enemies of the East country, which should afflict the Church of God, as did the Arabians, Sarasines, Turks, and Tartarians." (It mentions TARTARIANS in the footnote. Interesting!)]
-
And the four Angels were loosed, which were prepared at an hour, at a day, at a month, and at a year, to slay the third part of men.
Is it just me or does this sound a lot like the unleashing of the coronavirus on humanity?
EVERYONE mentions the Tartarians as a nation, all the way up until the early 20th century. At the time of this bible (mid 16th century), the Tartarian Empire still took up most of Asia and Eastern Europe (basically the area that later became the USSR).
The Rus Khanate (a Tartarian principality) had just started to claim it's superiority to all other Khanates, and began it's conquering of the Tartarian Empire. Since the Rus Khanate was always a part of the Tartarian Empire (or rather, the Scythian Empire, since they are just two names for the exact same culture and Aristocracy), the eventual takeover of the Empire by the Rus Khanate wasn't so much a "wiping out of the Tartarian Empire," but, as was proper and common within the power structure and Aristocracy, it was really just a continuation of it with a new Khanate in dominance.
In other words, Russia didn't "wipe out the Tartarian Empire," they just became the new leaders of it, and renamed it Russia. Russia's "independence," as recorded in history was an internal conflict. The Tartarian Empire didn't cease to exist, it just got a new sign over the door.
Such "Khanate dominance" was common in the Scythian Empire. They were always ruled by the same Aristocratic family however. The same family that rules Europe today in fact; the preserved bloodline of the Carolingians/Merovingians/Royal Scythians/Aryans.
When Russia became the USSR, and Rockefeller created the world wide school system, they worked to wipe the Tartarian/Scythian Empire from history. And they mostly succeeded. You have to pretty much completely ignore all scholarship on the topic in the late 19th and early 20th century and look to the past. When you do that, the erasure becomes obvious. It is even stated explicitly how it was finally erased from history by the USSR by burning all their history books, and forcing them to adopt a new alphabet. (The Alphabet Revolutions; See Kolarz, Russian and her colonies, 1952, starting on page 31). You have to really dig into the archeology as well, ignoring the "conclusions" and just looking at the evidence presented, since that was all performed by the USSR.
That is only part of the story though, because you also have to understand how Rockefeller et al created a new system of experts and method of scholarship to hide the history they wanted to hide, and promote the history they wanted to promote for their efforts in social engineering.
You further have to understand how Rockefeller/Rothschild created and managed the USSR to understand the real depth of the fuckery there.
I was watching a video the other day, and the tarters (?) Were mentioned. The video was of a lady reading a letter that had been in the Vatican library. It was from Pilate to Ceasar about the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. I'm not sure if the tarters and tartarians are the same though.
As far as I have found, the name "Tartary" or "Tartaria" (same name in different languages) was the name Genghis Khan gave to the Scythian Empire in the 12th century AD, which means it has nothing to do with the time of Caesar. My source for that particular statement comes from Denis Petau, The History of the World, or, An Account of Time, 1659 (page 760).
Having said that, I'm not even sure that the name "Scythia" was an internal name, so they might have called themselves something else. It might have been a name that other people called them. Like, we call the indigenous people of America "American Indians," but they called themselves the Maya, and Hopi, etc. However, I think they were, at least at some point, called the Scythians by themselves. It's really hard to tell.
But the Scythians were an absolute powerhouse of terror throughout the ancient world as far as I can tell. And the name for hell was "Tartarus" in the ancient world. There is also the Tartary river along the Caucasus Mtns. which was commonly a border for the Scythian Empire, and I think that name may predate Genghis Khan as well (not sure about that). Thus, it may be that "Tartarus" (hell) is related to the Scythian Empire. If so, then it's not impossible that it was in a letter in the first century AD. I'd like to know the source of that statement. It might give me a place to dig for that info. I haven't been able to make that connection even though I think there might be a connection to make.
This is the video spoken of above. I found it fascinating though I have doubts about the authenticity of the source, but I've not yet had a chance to dig into it. The woman reading the letter, reads out and shows the source document as she reads. What are your thoughts on the authenticity if you have a chance to listen to it? I found the mention of "Calvary" something I would need to further research.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQUJGceTH9I