While this is very funny, from a narrative warfare this has all the hallmarks of having a nefarious agenda. Very similar to RBG's "equality lawsuit" that originally brought her to fame. She argued sex discrimination hurts men as well, and brought a case to SCOTUS and later used that to push feminist cases.
This is the same. They make it sound like the poor man has a god given right to to be walking around in bare tits, but in reality, their end goal would be to legalise topless women walking around in public in front of kids.
Arguments focused on the lack of empirical evidence regarding an important governmental interest in bare-chested women, the law's perpetuation of sexual stereotypes based on a masculine ideology, the lack of similar laws in 48 other States, and data from the Kinsey reports of 1948 and 1953 indicating no difference in the extent to which male and female breasts can be used to provide sexual stimulation.
Again, "experts" providing bogus studies to push whatever they want to push.
Although the court did not find the New York law unconstitutional, it held that women are free to bare their breasts in public as long as that exposure is not for commercial purposes or is not lewd. Footnotes
The. question is, why is this guy being harassed, if the precedant has already been set for both men and women, and the law does not even prohibit men from exposing?
While this is very funny, from a narrative warfare this has all the hallmarks of having a nefarious agenda. Very similar to RBG's "equality lawsuit" that originally brought her to fame. She argued sex discrimination hurts men as well, and brought a case to SCOTUS and later used that to push feminist cases.
This is the same. They make it sound like the poor man has a god given right to to be walking around in bare tits, but in reality, their end goal would be to legalise topless women walking around in public in front of kids.
Excellent point!
In 1992 penal law 245.01 made it legal for women to go topless in public.
The code seems to indicate the opposite. It specifically says women's breasts are private
The people vs. Santorelli set a precedent for legal argument in favor of topless women in NY.
Thanks for this. From the case:
Again, "experts" providing bogus studies to push whatever they want to push.
The. question is, why is this guy being harassed, if the precedant has already been set for both men and women, and the law does not even prohibit men from exposing?