$540K is extremely high compared to a normal wage. If someone is making far beyond the standard market value of their work, I would call that "for profit".
540,000 a year isn't out of the norm for a COO and Treasurer for a large organization.
I really don't like the idea that there is something wrong with people making a large salary. It seems sort of....communist to me. Sounds a lot like stuff liberals talk about, salary caps and such.
And things like this are always subjecte. If you're making 60k a year, sure, 540k a year seems excessive. But if you're homeless, 60k a year seems excessive. It's just what you, personally, are accustomed to.
If it were a conservative doing that job, would you feel the same way?
I think it is excessive if the salary is paid by money taken through taxation or if the organization is promoted as "non profit" or charitable, when donations are collected.
Why should people earning 60K be taxed to pay a, likely less capable, person 540k? If you watch the Bud Light head of marketing's interview, you may end up realizing a lot of C-suit people are either retarded or corrupt.
The idea that we are in a merit based system is a lie, told to encourage slaves to work harder.
Dude, is this the first time you've ever heard about people working for nonprofits making big bucks? If you think that nonprofits are the only organizations who benefit from taxpayers dollars and whose executives make piles of bank, you must not pay much attention.
I didn't say that many of them weren't corrupt or incompetent. Just that the idea of saying someone is making too much money is a bit communist.
If you want to start campaigning for salary caps and crying about how Capitalism works, I'm sure the liberals will welcome you with open arms and big wet slobbery kisses.
Do you think everyone that works at a non-profit works for free? Non-profit doesn't mean they don't get paid.
$540K is extremely high compared to a normal wage. If someone is making far beyond the standard market value of their work, I would call that "for profit".
540,000 a year isn't out of the norm for a COO and Treasurer for a large organization.
I really don't like the idea that there is something wrong with people making a large salary. It seems sort of....communist to me. Sounds a lot like stuff liberals talk about, salary caps and such.
And things like this are always subjecte. If you're making 60k a year, sure, 540k a year seems excessive. But if you're homeless, 60k a year seems excessive. It's just what you, personally, are accustomed to.
If it were a conservative doing that job, would you feel the same way?
I think it is excessive if the salary is paid by money taken through taxation or if the organization is promoted as "non profit" or charitable, when donations are collected.
Why should people earning 60K be taxed to pay a, likely less capable, person 540k? If you watch the Bud Light head of marketing's interview, you may end up realizing a lot of C-suit people are either retarded or corrupt.
The idea that we are in a merit based system is a lie, told to encourage slaves to work harder.
Dude, is this the first time you've ever heard about people working for nonprofits making big bucks? If you think that nonprofits are the only organizations who benefit from taxpayers dollars and whose executives make piles of bank, you must not pay much attention.
I didn't say that many of them weren't corrupt or incompetent. Just that the idea of saying someone is making too much money is a bit communist.
If you want to start campaigning for salary caps and crying about how Capitalism works, I'm sure the liberals will welcome you with open arms and big wet slobbery kisses.