The other commenter said that since he posts tiktoks, I guess he thinks that for some reason it means he doesn't have to post sources since it's a video app. I'm saying there's a place to post sources that he doesn't use called the comment section and the description. I haven't changed my argument at all nor moved any goal posts. In fact, the other dude moved the goalposts by making this about RFK when I'm using this opportunity to talk about how the dudes a grifter passing off others research as his own and not posting sourcing anywhere. IDGAF about the dudes call to arms about voting for RFK (said that in the first reply to the commenter), I care that he doesn't give everyone the tools to discern this information for themselves, and thinks he can just get away with passing other people's work off as his own. Make no mistake, if he sourced things, he'd be linking to the superstonk library, here, and older Twitter threads that would make his videos redundant as everyone can just consume the info themselves without the need for his video commentary. No one would watch him, hence why he keeps sources to himself. That's the branding I'm talking about, my original argument that has not changed nor moved from the onset.
If all war is based on deception this doesn’t mean anything. Why would RFK be allowed to talk about vaccines, blackrock/vanguard and the deep state if he was a black hat?
Social media isn’t a PHD thesis paper Jesus Christ do you understand how tik tok works?
Yes, it has a description section and a comment section where you can post your sources.
Obvious moving of goalposts for your ridiculous "never gives sources" statement.
The other commenter said that since he posts tiktoks, I guess he thinks that for some reason it means he doesn't have to post sources since it's a video app. I'm saying there's a place to post sources that he doesn't use called the comment section and the description. I haven't changed my argument at all nor moved any goal posts. In fact, the other dude moved the goalposts by making this about RFK when I'm using this opportunity to talk about how the dudes a grifter passing off others research as his own and not posting sourcing anywhere. IDGAF about the dudes call to arms about voting for RFK (said that in the first reply to the commenter), I care that he doesn't give everyone the tools to discern this information for themselves, and thinks he can just get away with passing other people's work off as his own. Make no mistake, if he sourced things, he'd be linking to the superstonk library, here, and older Twitter threads that would make his videos redundant as everyone can just consume the info themselves without the need for his video commentary. No one would watch him, hence why he keeps sources to himself. That's the branding I'm talking about, my original argument that has not changed nor moved from the onset.
And so what? He puts the studies he sites in a screen shot in the background of his videos. Plenty of other truth tellers do the same thing.
If he was disinfo he is pretty bad at it. Sorry brother but I just think you are doing puritan stuff and we can agree to disagree.
I don’t think Ian Carroll is deep state until I get actual evidence he and/or RFK JR are.
https://twitter.com/HomeboyLelo/status/1714534349989703886
If all war is based on deception this doesn’t mean anything. Why would RFK be allowed to talk about vaccines, blackrock/vanguard and the deep state if he was a black hat?
I cant believe this got downvotes. Smh.