The other commenter said that since he posts tiktoks, I guess he thinks that for some reason it means he doesn't have to post sources since it's a video app. I'm saying there's a place to post sources that he doesn't use called the comment section and the description. I haven't changed my argument at all nor moved any goal posts. In fact, the other dude moved the goalposts by making this about RFK when I'm using this opportunity to talk about how the dudes a grifter passing off others research as his own and not posting sourcing anywhere. IDGAF about the dudes call to arms about voting for RFK (said that in the first reply to the commenter), I care that he doesn't give everyone the tools to discern this information for themselves, and thinks he can just get away with passing other people's work off as his own. Make no mistake, if he sourced things, he'd be linking to the superstonk library, here, and older Twitter threads that would make his videos redundant as everyone can just consume the info themselves without the need for his video commentary. No one would watch him, hence why he keeps sources to himself. That's the branding I'm talking about, my original argument that has not changed nor moved from the onset.