A shit article referencing modern day opinions of activist courts slanted towards a group it benefits?
The founders really could have done us a solid by just adding the words, "nothing in these proceeding articles of this Constitution are to be interpreted differently than stated therein."
I agree it’s bullshit, however, those judges legislating from the bench are ruling that election officials cannot require proof of citizenship since it’s not a federal law— lawfare has been going on for a very long time, no common sense and the intent to corrupt rules the day. I don’t see the bill passing, unfortunately.
A shit article referencing modern day opinions of activist courts slanted towards a group it benefits?
The founders really could have done us a solid by just adding the words, "nothing in these proceeding articles of this Constitution are to be interpreted differently than stated therein."
I agree it’s bullshit, however, those judges legislating from the bench are ruling that election officials cannot require proof of citizenship since it’s not a federal law— lawfare has been going on for a very long time, no common sense and the intent to corrupt rules the day. I don’t see the bill passing, unfortunately.