I have one overall response and question for you. What if I do know more than you or most of the people here about whats really going on? Would that be somehow a bad thing for everyone? ....Its really not like I'm making stupid claims about stuff that can easily be disproven eg: "the earth is flat" or "trump is actually dead and has been replaced"
I'm sure there are people on here who know a whole lot more than they will ever admit me or you. If those people they make hard to swallow claims that cannot easily be disproved, does that then make them some how at odds with their "peers" (who don't like what they say for whatever reason)?
Thinking Barron is Q or on the Q team is exactly the way the death cult had us in this position in the first place. Cmon people, quit grasping at straws. there is plenty available to give you hope without resorting to believing the ludicrous."
Because the it makes them feel like they aren't like the OP and aren't falling for that crazy jump to conclusion stuff anymore....
...but really its just because it wasn't featured in a Scotty mar10 Video.
If those people they make hard to swallow claims that cannot easily be disproved,
The onus to 'prove' or make a case is on he who makes the claim, not the other way around.
Because the it makes them feel like they aren't like the OP and
I think when you start making claims about what other people are thinking or what they are feeling, you're on pretty shakey territory. One of the elements that in my view, weakens your arguments (case) rather than strengthening them.
I have one overall response and question for you. What if I do know more than you or most of the people here about whats really going on? Would that be somehow a bad thing for everyone? ....Its really not like I'm making stupid claims about stuff that can easily be disproven eg: "the earth is flat" or "trump is actually dead and has been replaced"
I'm sure there are people on here who know a whole lot more than they will ever admit me or you. If those people they make hard to swallow claims that cannot easily be disproved, does that then make them some how at odds with their "peers" (who don't like what they say for whatever reason)?
Everyone loves reddoric like this:
u/LongTimeListener
Thinking Barron is Q or on the Q team is exactly the way the death cult had us in this position in the first place. Cmon people, quit grasping at straws. there is plenty available to give you hope without resorting to believing the ludicrous."
Because the it makes them feel like they aren't like the OP and aren't falling for that crazy jump to conclusion stuff anymore....
...but really its just because it wasn't featured in a Scotty mar10 Video.
The onus to 'prove' or make a case is on he who makes the claim, not the other way around.
I think when you start making claims about what other people are thinking or what they are feeling, you're on pretty shakey territory. One of the elements that in my view, weakens your arguments (case) rather than strengthening them.