Reuters article on Putin wanting a ceasefire, I have my doubts.
Reuters: "Three of the sources, familiar with discussions in Putin's entourage."
👉Taylor Swift has an entourage, Putin has an administration.
Reuters "spoke to a total of five people who work with or have worked with Putin at a senior level in the political and business worlds.
👉People who have worked (past tense) with Putin in "political and business worlds." How would a source who "worked" with Putin in the business world (whatever that even means) have any idea about Russian war plans.
Reuters: "The fifth source did not comment on freezing the war at the current frontlines" and "Putin can fight for as long as it takes, but Putin is also ready for a ceasefire – to freeze the war."
👉The real purpose of this article is to float freeze and see Russia's reaction.
Reuters: "One of the sources predicted no agreement could happen while Zelenskiy was in power."
👉More to the point, how receptive Russia may be to a freeze if Zelensky was not in the equation.
This is not about Putin wanting a ceasefire. This article is a trial balloon towards the Kremlin, 'if Zelensky goes, would you be open to a freeze?'
Putin also likely has seized evidence of bioweapon development in Ukraine during the war, and can potentially expose their involvement in creating Covid-19 and other diseases to target the Russians and other dissenting voices against the Great Reset.
In other words, he has an Ace up his sleeve in the negotiation
Russian claims about this early on in the war fell on deaf ears. I think too many Anons think evidence and the truth are sufficient, but as we've seen with all the election fraud cases they aren't if you can't ever get them presented fairly.
https://theduran.locals.com/post/5672276/reuters-article-on-putin-wanting-a-ceasefire-i-have-my-doubts
Reuters article on Putin wanting a ceasefire, I have my doubts. Reuters: "Three of the sources, familiar with discussions in Putin's entourage." 👉Taylor Swift has an entourage, Putin has an administration.
Reuters "spoke to a total of five people who work with or have worked with Putin at a senior level in the political and business worlds. 👉People who have worked (past tense) with Putin in "political and business worlds." How would a source who "worked" with Putin in the business world (whatever that even means) have any idea about Russian war plans.
Reuters: "The fifth source did not comment on freezing the war at the current frontlines" and "Putin can fight for as long as it takes, but Putin is also ready for a ceasefire – to freeze the war." 👉The real purpose of this article is to float freeze and see Russia's reaction.
Reuters: "One of the sources predicted no agreement could happen while Zelenskiy was in power." 👉More to the point, how receptive Russia may be to a freeze if Zelensky was not in the equation.
This is not about Putin wanting a ceasefire. This article is a trial balloon towards the Kremlin, 'if Zelensky goes, would you be open to a freeze?'
Putin also likely has seized evidence of bioweapon development in Ukraine during the war, and can potentially expose their involvement in creating Covid-19 and other diseases to target the Russians and other dissenting voices against the Great Reset.
In other words, he has an Ace up his sleeve in the negotiation
Russian claims about this early on in the war fell on deaf ears. I think too many Anons think evidence and the truth are sufficient, but as we've seen with all the election fraud cases they aren't if you can't ever get them presented fairly.