It seems like the whole statement is cracking on the prosecutor, denying his motion to modify conditions of release. So I don't actually understand, having read the entire post, why she says at the end that the Court determines to deny "Defendant Trump's" motion.
Smith started the game by his motion, and Trump returned service, so two motions are in play. It wouldn't make sense to deny Smith's motion but entertain Trump's motion, so this is just cleaning off the kitchen counter. (I think.)
I like Judge Cannon... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Amen, follows the letter of the law and not the DC DS BS. Thank you prayers on the way. Cheers to you also.
It seems like the whole statement is cracking on the prosecutor, denying his motion to modify conditions of release. So I don't actually understand, having read the entire post, why she says at the end that the Court determines to deny "Defendant Trump's" motion.
Smith started the game by his motion, and Trump returned service, so two motions are in play. It wouldn't make sense to deny Smith's motion but entertain Trump's motion, so this is just cleaning off the kitchen counter. (I think.)