I suspect Tucker is a soft psyop -- meaning he knows about things well in advance of when he "breaks" them - like a calculated delay in putting critical issues on a big platform after "fringe" knowledge has already started becoming "common" knowledge when it no longer can be denied. But also when it starts to no longer matter except to demoralize the audience. The window of time already passed when an uninformed public could have made better decisions or effected more change than they are now able to or motivated to.
Of course he doesn't always do this, or his credibility would be seriously questioned by more. But it's been noticeable enough, he gets some sort of green light to move forward with certain topics. The vaccine injuries are the most obvious example, the Gaza genocide being another.
Tucker admitted he’s run psyops.
He said it in an interview maybe 2 weeks ago? It was even posted here. He admitted the media ran psyop and he knows psyops well because he has run many being in the media. I’m paraphrasing.
It was the same interview where he said he believed in these fallen angel demon type things.
Haven't heard that. His dad was an investigative reporter for years and was appointed as director of 'Voice of America' by Ronald Reagan. In 2021 he was director of Policy Impact, a firm that has lobbied the US on behalf of the Viktor Orbán government in Hungary.
Never suggested that he did, although some do. I only said I hadn't heard or read it. If you have a source it would be appreciated. He may well have been a clown asset. Just as you may or I may be for all the world knows.
I would guess there are a tiny handful of people at the CIA who feel bad about some of what has been done and that its no way to run a nation. I think Tucker and Alex Jones probably have links with these people as well and one or two others who do the rounds but they have no real institutional influence over policy in the agency.
I view the world as having a few different power factions.
The Zionists - tied into the MIC and Intel agencies, international finance but among the Zionists they are not a unified camp. They go from the New York faction who just want to steal land vs the Khanists who have the red heffers and want to bring about the apocalypse.
You have the "techno-totalitarians" who are some of the big industrialists like Rockefeller and the big tech firms who are really into global government. The Zionists I believe might swallow government if it was run from Tel Aviv but don't really trust them.
You also have the third worldist faction lead by George Soros and open society who believe by turning the whole world into South Africa that they will be able to rule unopposed over garbage heap.
I've heard the comment that the globalists became more divided after David Rockefeller died. That a schism has opened up to some degree since then.
Isn't Carlson tied to the CIA through his daddy?
Yes, and Hunter was his neighbor. I haven’t heard any psyop from Tucker though.
We are no better than Ukraine….a country of oligarchs. How incestuous is the whole DC area.
I suspect Tucker is a soft psyop -- meaning he knows about things well in advance of when he "breaks" them - like a calculated delay in putting critical issues on a big platform after "fringe" knowledge has already started becoming "common" knowledge when it no longer can be denied. But also when it starts to no longer matter except to demoralize the audience. The window of time already passed when an uninformed public could have made better decisions or effected more change than they are now able to or motivated to.
Of course he doesn't always do this, or his credibility would be seriously questioned by more. But it's been noticeable enough, he gets some sort of green light to move forward with certain topics. The vaccine injuries are the most obvious example, the Gaza genocide being another.
Pressure valve that makes people think something is getting done.
The same could be said about at least 17 other things...but let's give them the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
This is a good point. Who should we trust more, Kansas or Tucker?
Tucker admitted he’s run psyops. He said it in an interview maybe 2 weeks ago? It was even posted here. He admitted the media ran psyop and he knows psyops well because he has run many being in the media. I’m paraphrasing.
It was the same interview where he said he believed in these fallen angel demon type things.
I think he’s a Ghost in the Machine type.
Well, what has Q said about Tucker?
Haven't heard that. His dad was an investigative reporter for years and was appointed as director of 'Voice of America' by Ronald Reagan. In 2021 he was director of Policy Impact, a firm that has lobbied the US on behalf of the Viktor Orbán government in Hungary.
He didn't wear his CIA badge on his lapel, just as no one else does either.
Never suggested that he did, although some do. I only said I hadn't heard or read it. If you have a source it would be appreciated. He may well have been a clown asset. Just as you may or I may be for all the world knows.
Putin did hint at it tho.
Nope. Dad was CIA.
He’s admitted that as much. Anderson Cooper is cia obviously. They have people in many industries not just voice of America.
Ted Cruz's dad too, right?
I would guess there are a tiny handful of people at the CIA who feel bad about some of what has been done and that its no way to run a nation. I think Tucker and Alex Jones probably have links with these people as well and one or two others who do the rounds but they have no real institutional influence over policy in the agency.
Right. I think there's a big war for control behind the scenes among the elites, who are just as divided as the rest of the country is.
I view the world as having a few different power factions.
The Zionists - tied into the MIC and Intel agencies, international finance but among the Zionists they are not a unified camp. They go from the New York faction who just want to steal land vs the Khanists who have the red heffers and want to bring about the apocalypse.
You have the "techno-totalitarians" who are some of the big industrialists like Rockefeller and the big tech firms who are really into global government. The Zionists I believe might swallow government if it was run from Tel Aviv but don't really trust them.
You also have the third worldist faction lead by George Soros and open society who believe by turning the whole world into South Africa that they will be able to rule unopposed over garbage heap.
I've heard the comment that the globalists became more divided after David Rockefeller died. That a schism has opened up to some degree since then.
During an interview someone said Tucker had tried to get into the CIA and was told no. Tucker dispute it.