interesting point about the SC immunity decision. any lawfags wanna address the second half of this?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
this is a discussion; it needs no link.
i could provide a link to the text of the supreme court decision, or links to the role of mens rea in the american legal system.
let me be clear:
I am an amateur law enthusiast....barely. I am not looking for answers from people with my own level of legal expertise. There are people on this board who actually know law. I am not one of them, and I suspect you aren't really either. unless its just the meds?
I respect the enthusiasm. I understand the urge to quash liberal arguments very well. not trying to be insulting. All of us here have different areas of expertise. But this is a moderately complex legal discussion, and if it sounds like word salad to you, then I don't think either of us are equipped to provide the answer. But someone here is.
EDIT: Genuinely, much love to the pede that replied with much vigor, and then removed their comments. I also wanted to tell this person they were a stupid liberal spewing nonsense, but what I wanted more was to provide an actual argument based in the law. I don't need to crowd-source rage against liberals....I have loads of that. Legal knowledge is where any response I could make would be lacking.
You Jew, you deleted your own comments...
No need to reply, blocked.