There has been much discussion about when America became a "Corporation". I think the real question we have to ask is "When did the Americans become slaves to the Bankers?" because that is the real implication whenever someone refers to America becoming a corporation. In this post I will show you when and how this happened.
Introduction
There are four elements to how American were transformed from free people to slaves to the Banks. I intend to show each of these points from the congressional records.
-
Trading with the enemy Act was expanded from wartime to peacetime, enabling the president to legally confiscate everyone's properties as long as they are considered enemies.
-
Banks were given the dictatorship over the country's finances.
-
Fed was given the power to issue new currency called Federal Reserve Bank Notes (FRBN) not backed by Gold.
-
These FRBNs were backed by the mortgages of homes and other properties of ALL people of the US.
Background
By March 1933, bank after bank in US failed and on March 6, President Roosevelt issued Proclamation 2039 ordering the suspension of all banking transactions, effective immediately. He had taken the oath of office only thirty-six hours earlier.
Congressional Act
On March 9th 1933, 73rd Congress convened and passed the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 to provide emergency relief to the banks and enable them to resume operations. On his first fireside chats to the nation FDR assured the people of the US that he had it all under control and it made the people feel all warm and fuzzy. This was also the beginning of FDR's New Deal
But did something nefarious happen, like James Traficant mentioned on congressional record decades later?
The Proof
I am going to prove to you that indeed something nefarious happen on that day, by referring only to the congressional record of that day.
Source: Congressional Record March 9 1933
Page 75: Message from the President
To the Senate and House of Representatives:
On March 3 banking operations in the United States ceased. To review at this time the causes of this failure of our banking system is unnecessary. Suffice it to say that
the Government has been compelled to step in for the pro- tection of depositors and the business of the Nation.
To review at this time the causes of this failure of our banking system is unnecessary.
Really? You want to fix it without knowing why it failed?
Page 79: Amendment of the Trading with the Enemy Act, Oct 6 1917 Full Text to extend the emergency. powers of the President not just in war time but also in peacetime:
Section 2 confers upon the President the powers bestowed under the act of October 6, 1917, regardless of whether or not the country is involved in war.
What does it mean to allow the President to confiscate property of our enemies, during peace time? Who exactly are these enemies in peacetime?
Page 80: Concerns of dictatorship by the same bankers who caused the problems.
It is an important banking bill. It is a dictatorship over finance in the United States. It is complete control over the banking system in the United States.
We have, step by step, been proceeding along the lines of centralization. Attempts in past meetings of this Congress have succeeded in enacting increasingly centralized banking plans. This gives supreme authority to those people who have wanted to control the finances of this Government, through a centralized system, to have such a system.
We want to know the amount of gold in the United States Treasury, and we want to know the amount of gold in the Federal Reserve System. We want to know the total amount of outstanding Government ob- ligations.
This is a time to draw a line, and may I say to you Democrats here that if you do not draw a line through the Treasury operations now and the Federal Reserve operations, you will be enmeshed in all the things that they have been doing, and they have been doing some things, as I have pointed out heretofore, or we would not be in the condition we are in today.
It seems to me there is authority here to continue the Federal Reserve operations under the same management, and it seems to me I can see much in this bill that can be abused and that may have been dictated by the same banking influences that are responsible for our present predicament.
It is difficult under the circumstances to discuss this bill. The first section of the bill, as I grasped it, is practically the war powers that were given back in 1917, with some slight amendments.
The other gives supreme authority to the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States to impound all the gold in the United States in the hands of individuals, corporations, or companies for the purpose, I suppose, of bringing together that gold and making it available for the issuance of Federal Reserve notes.
This provision is for the issuance of Federal Reserve bank notes; not for Federal Reserve notes;
Page 81: How are FRBNs issued?
Mr. BRITTEN. From my observation of the bill as it
was read to the House, it would appear that the amount of bank notes that might be issued by the Federal Reserve System is not limited. That will depend entirely upon the amount of collateral that is presented from time to time for exchange for bank notes. Is that not correct?
Mr. McFADDEN. .Yes. I think that is correct.
Trust the Experts and Good intentions:
However, we are advised by President Roosevelt in his message which has just been read that the immediate pas- sage of this legislation is absolutely .necessary in order to reopen the banks in the Nation and provide them with additional and adequate currency. We are further informed by our distinguished majority leader [Mr. BYRNS] that the Sen- ate is now awaiting the action of the House on this particular bill, and that in order to reopen the banks of the country on tomorrow it must be enacted into law today. I shall, therefore, vote for the bill, Mr. Speaker, because of these assurances of our great President and our able leaders in this body.
Page 83: This was supposed to be temporary
Our President will doubtless ask amendments to this new law when conditions are more nor- mal and when it is better understood.
Page 83: The CRUX of what backs the new money the FED is allowed to print
Under the new law the money is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade accept- ances, and banker's acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation
And finally, we ask ourselves these two questions:
-
Why did the War Powers under Trading with the Enemy act had to be expanded to peacetime as part of Emergency Banking Act ?
-
How did the Congress manage to pass a bill where the mortgage on all homes and other property of all the people in the Nation was handed over to the FED to be able to print its new currency?
Looks like we found our answer as to why all mortgages are transferred to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac immediately upon creation by loan originators.
https://www.investopedia.com/mortgage/fannie-mae-loans/
So let me get this straight, we need liquidity in the mortgage market, so we need Fannie Mae. We need liquidity in the stock market (ownership of business), so we need hedge funds.
Why is CHURN so important to these people? This whole thing can’t possibly be so stupid as to just be a giant machine to increase transaction fees, on top of the usurious interest?
Can it?
Maybe they’re trying to obfuscate real ownership so it can’t be known or verified anymore? What’s the importance of contracts being constantly moving?
Someone needs to dig into Manny Mae and Freddia Mac and its ownership structure. My guess is that its connected to the people controlling the Fed - because these Bankers want to keep their liens tight at hand.
Just like a bank can loan 900% of the actual deposits, its about the multiplying effect loans have.
If one mortgage can allow them to issue 100K in loans backed by that mortgage, if they make 5 mortgages on the same property, they can issue 500K in loans.
And these loans, in turn, multiply everytime that money is deposited back into the Banks by acting as reserves and allowing them to loan out again.
Its definitely NOT about transaction fees or interests.
It looks like we are saying the same thing to me. Interest and transaction fees are the profit taking of those additional loans.
Unless you’re looking past the sale and saying that the more loans that get written, the more loans that can’t be repaid, which means the more asset seizures.
England seems to have gone through similar events to the one we are in at least 2-3 times since William the Conqueror, which may have been one of them in itself - 1066, 1190, 1688, surely another one in the 1750-2000 range.
What if 1190 was an early step in gathering an opposition to force John to sign the Magna Carta in 1215 following all the attempted debt seizures? We don’t really cover it here much, but the Magna Carta was likely a huge step toward our own Constitution and more valid aspects of our legal framework.
It may also be good for us to map the feudal system overtop of the current corporate structures, as “holding companies” seem like a modern abstract form of a physical feudal castle. “Held in Fee”. Wal-Mart is similar to the Lincolnshire district. Who is the king and/or princes of that structure? Not the corporate board of the company, but who the board reports to.
This is also an important aspect, because ultimately there is no wealth but real wealth and owning all the properties is a goal for the Cabal.
Yeah we dont talk about Magna Carta much at all. I have been meaning to dig into it. I have read both sides of the theories - that Magna Carta was written by patriots to stop overreach by the King, and on the other side, Magna Carta was a Cabal creation to saddle the King with parliament and by controlling the parliament you can seriously hamper any efforts by the King to root out the Cabal.
If you were to write up a dig about Magna Carta, it would be amazing.
The fact is the cabal HATES monarchies. The cabal has systematically destroyed the monarchies of the world, save the one it fully infiltrated in the UK. They were behind the fall of the German Kaisers, the fall of the Russian Czars, the French Revolution…
I was under the impression that your comment related to the idea that the banks are "lending into existence" newly-created money (not theirs, not borrowed either) and experiencing a windfall from the mortgage payments. It would seem natural to want to repeat this process as many times as possible, therefore the "churn". Am I wrong?
I keep one section of bookmarks for research topics. Added this.
Not only England, but everywhere in the then Catholic world due to something what is called: Sovereign debt.
IMF has a very interesting report on it.
Around the 12th century, the Pope needed money. And at the same time issued several bulls pertaining to salvation: Unam sanctam, and was embroiled with John and Federick for the upper hand in the Holy Roman Empire based on fraud called: the gift of Constantine.
This created a structure in which future earnings could be leveraged for the convenience of money today. This was done with the help of Genuese Merchants (black nobility?) providing for an eternal principal loan which would never be paid back, but would incur a yearly interest.
Yeah, I knew about the other 5 or so former reserve currencies, and how they’d previously held military/financial/religious all in the same country before breaking it up this time. Unlike those 5, I know some of the specifics of England’s battles with them, having seen them by chance. France’s undoubtedly involves Napoleon. Germany’s surely involves Prussia and probably Belgium. There’s a good book called “The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” that touches on their degradation of silver specie prior to any of this over 600-1000 or so years, among other things.
Didn’t know the loans all started with the pope. Rather assumed they predated even that.
900% of deposits? You're living in the past. They did away completely with the reserve requirement. Banks today can lend as much as they feel comfortable lending.
Banks don’t lend jack squat. Your signature on their Promissory Notes (PN) create debt contracts for the signer. Then those PNs are traded to the Fed for FRNs. Promissory notes traded for promissory notes. You are now a debt slave and have to continue payments even though your “loan” (PN with your signature) has already been paid off. Yes, you are paying a second time slave. Your birth certificate is printed on bond paper for a reason.
Ever notice that the balance numbers on your statement are not negative numbers?There is no - (minus) in front of the numbers because they all have been paid already yet ignorant little us don’t understand the legalities of the system and keep slaving away and giving them our legal tender instead of killing the contracts due to fraud.
There is no money in the USA since gold and silver coin were taken away. Only notes, financial debt instruments, remain. If more and more debt is not created the whole system collapses. Notes for notes is name of the game. Until people wake up anyway.
I can't comprehend the reason you got downdoots for this. I agree with you.
Oops, sorry, cant keep up with the leap frogging of the Banksters!
Ever heard of "three card monty" or the slight of hand "shell game" ? Got to keep that pea moving.
Or the good old game of hot potatoes.
Which is why our debt notes should not be saved but rather used to purchase long term Store of Value
Yeah...phractional reserve phuckery...