She can hire someone with a gun to keep her safe, but we shouldn't be allowed to keep ourselves safe for free? The nerve of these people is unbelievable.
Then she should publicly fire him and set the precedent for other security personnel to just let things happen. Let’s see how that goes when the word gets out. See if she “sticks to her guns” then.
This- excellent example of what we need to do to use their agenda against them. There should be public backlash telling her to live by her example and have security that is not armed. If she pushes back, what makes her more important than others. We need to highlight the hypocrisy and push forward.
She can hire someone with a gun to keep her safe, but we shouldn't be allowed to keep ourselves safe for free? The nerve of these people is unbelievable.
She didn't hire him - she gets a security duty. She pays nothing.
Then she should publicly fire him and set the precedent for other security personnel to just let things happen. Let’s see how that goes when the word gets out. See if she “sticks to her guns” then.
That’s a great point. We the people should not allow her to have a gun at all forever to see how she feels when she is telling us not to have guns..
This- excellent example of what we need to do to use their agenda against them. There should be public backlash telling her to live by her example and have security that is not armed. If she pushes back, what makes her more important than others. We need to highlight the hypocrisy and push forward.