J6 Ashli Babbit Was A Crisis Actor

posted 131 days ago by VaccinesCauseSIDS 131 days ago by VaccinesCauseSIDS +27 / -2

42 second video clip of Ashli Babbit supposedly getting shot.

Scrutinize this video clip frame-by-frame. Can slow down video if necessary.

Notes:

cop had no plausible reason to shoot his gun.
cop moves his gun to the left, just before shooting,
cop is shooting at a target, with uniformed police behind her
cops are yelling at people to leave, and cop is completely ignored by everyone. cop inexplicably does not escalate use of force to induce their compliance.

When you look at this frame-by-frame, nothing makes sense, because its completely un-natural, unbelievable, illogical, etc

https://rumble.com/vs33gx-video-of-ashli-babbit...an-unarmed-protester-who-was-shot-dead-january-6th.html

10 comments

10 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (10)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Slyver 2 points 131 days ago +2 / -0

No one with a brain cell argues with this point, which is why most consider it murder and not a justified shooting.

I'm fairly certain I have a minimum of one brain cell, and I have "argued with that point" many times. This is therefore at least an exaggeration (I have at least one brain cell) and is more likely a completely false statement.

I don't know exactly what you mean by "just before shooting" but he appears to be aiming at the nearest "threat" at the barricade, shifting his target to Babbit because she appears close to getting over it.

At no point during the shooting does his gun appear to be aimed at where Babbit's wound supposedly was, especially during the actual firing. The angles are all wrong.

They come in shortly after up the stairs, so it's perfectly reasonable that this "officer" wouldn't have known they were there.

This seems to be a disconnected "important fact," or at least I don't see how this is relevant to the argument.

The same can be said for point four (from my perspective). Why do you think your statement is a counter argument to Babbitt being a staged event?

almost every example of an actual crisis actor is able to be linked to someone who, you know, acts for a living.

Immediately after the shooting I tried to figure out who Ashley Babbitt was because the shooting looked so obviously staged to me. I couldn't find anything on her. She had no service record, no online presence, no family, no phone number, no past addresses, nothing. No such person as Ashley Babbitt had ever existed according to any database I had access to. Not even "Ashley Babbit's" that weren't her.

Since then, all of that stuff has been filled in, though I challenge you to find anything about her using any search that limits the search date before Jan. 6th. When people named as her family members were introduced to us via the news, I did a similar search for them. None of them existed either if you limit your search before Jan. 6th.

As far as I can tell, Ashley Babbitt doesn't have the crisis actor cues because Ashley Babbitt is a person born on Jan. 6th 2021 for the purposes of the staged event.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q