Well, I am smelling a rat also, from the moment I saw the stage footage ... somethings are off ....

However, there is another contingency that must be addressed. Bear with me, and do not respond immediately. taste it, test it.

First: what makes a good movie?
Second, how do you neutralize a trap laid by an opponent?
Third, FISA works both ways.

Q mentioned two items: good actors, and Jason Bourne.

Bourne

Now, you all will probably have seen the movies. Q specifically mentions deep dream, which is in the fourth installment movie, Jason Bourne.

What about the book by the same name. The original of 1980, set in the seventies. https://www.amazon.com/dp/0553593544/ Did you read it? I bet only few have done so. I for one did, and the movies we have seen these last 10years, do not represent the story in the book. And that is of profound import. Even the series starring Richard Chamberlain does not do real credit to the book.

This book, basically, is about one special skill while lacking knowledge: to spring a trap by moving into it. So, please, take a night or two to read it, and reflect on it, especially, this particular item.

And then look at the stage again. How do you spring a trap?

Ok, one thing needs addressing: getting into benefits of one or the other is nice. However, also a distraction as it puts the horse behind the cart instead of in front. Benefits follow actions, not the other way round. Benefits may indicate reasons to do so. But, what appears to be primary driver, may obscure what lies beneath.

40,000-feet

Let' s go up there, at 40.000 feet and look around the world. What do you see? Do you see a war being conducted across the financial system? To point you into a direct correlation:

What happened before 9/11 with the airline stock? What happened before the assassination-attempt with $DJT? Shorting?

Someone is loosing big time here. Someone knew beforehand and thought it a wise move to make a quick buck. Instead it became a fiasco. Did you notice Bitcoin's moves? And Ethereum? Up 10%. Slum' s over I guess.

What does the outcome of the attempt have to do with Crypto coins? Makes you go: hmmmm, right?

This brings us to the question: what was the trap? I find it interesting that the idea of assassination was carried by many on the right 12 months ago.

Imagine. When asked about post Trump plans, Q answered there were. And yet, did we not got carried into the egregoire of an Trump assassination? How did we feel about it? Yes, strongly negative. And this is what happens, when such an egregoire gets setup and fueled by emotional energy.

So, it may not have been a trap laid by the DS, but on a different plane, we are are not very aware of.

And this brings me to another Q quote: Combat tactics, Mr Ryan. You perform the act before it can become a bigger uncontrolled thing that succeeds. You cut the head of when it is small.

20,000-feet

I am going to decrease altitude to 20.000 feet. So, what did we really see? What did you really see? Can you count?

"All the way up to six, if I have to".

Who shot first? No, who shot first? This is not about what you think you saw, what you were told you saw, but what you see moving.

I don' t know about you, but I was cut in the ear by the barber. It is a continuous stream that dropped down on my clothing. I grant you, back then, we did not have instant clotting shit. Maybe they do have that, to temporarily dress a wound. Maybe they don not, but the pics I saw, do show a wound already dried up and clotted. No drops on the collar of the white shirt. No blood on the right hand on the inside.

The the actions of the SS on stage. What' s with the hands. Are they using their hands as a solar shield?

And why the wait? O that is right. That is the fist moment, where the head is stationary and clearly visible. IF, there had been multiple shooters, that would have been the moment.

So, basically, the scheme is setup in such a way, it must fail, yet convey a message.

Now, many will point out to the obvious: Trump needed it for political success. My answer is: no. He does not need it. The man draws crowds of such size, that even Stefanapoulos had to correct Biden and say: no contest.

Is there a political advantage to this mess? O yes, for sure. And Trump acted on it, with his fist in the air.

Has Trump played dirty before? Do I have to mention: mar-a-lago and Trump Tower? Do I have to mention that Trump encourages republicans to fight the dems with their own weapons.

And then, Q says: not everything will be clean. ...

Of course not. Enemies beset on all sides, desperate for booty, ....and what then is the best strategy: to lead the opposition[them] yourself.

Poetically it is even described in Ezekiel about Gog of Magog. With hooks in his jaws to be lead down south. O yes, maybe Gog never wanted to to, but the hooks forced him to. See how it works? Lead them yourself.

IF the DS uses blackmail, infiltration, etc, how do you employ these tactics to your advantage? Art of the deal is knowing what elements are bearing upon all parties to a deal.

NATO: pay up, you are delinquent. Otherwise I might not protect you if push comes to shove. You liked that? Those bloody Europeans not paying their fair share, right? And you would be right. But what is this? it is a form of blackmail: pushing the advantage.

And why did it work? Because they were already meddling in Ukraine! Remember Helsinki?
And they thought to hang it around the neck of the US. Remember Burisma? MH17? Those beautiful gas-reserves the EU longs to exploit for internal security reasons?

Expand this into other areas.

prepare to land

Bringing the altitude further down,we get to the point where we indeed have to consider other items, like the apparent functional impediments of the USSS, the Penn police forces, etc. Better look incompetent than guilty?

Was something planned? By all means, it would be very feasible. The chatter is there. So, how do you front run it? u/#q1800

I have to pose the question: is rather looking incompetent than guilty acting appropriate? In order to do what?

Again, the book Jason Bourne gives you the clues.

This leaves another item,tough item to address. Contemplate the Q posts with the phrase: "this is not a game".

THOSE WHO YOU TRUST THE MOST ARE THE MOST EVIL. THIS IS NOT A GAME. HUMMANITY IS AT STAKE.

Interesting spelling mistake. But, if that is the stake: humanity, we are seeing two dimensions. One dimension is: man himself. The second one, related to that, is the quality of man. And it all comes down to three elements: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

If these stakes are in play, to what lengths is one to go, or allowed to go? If you could save 500 by acting out a play, that costs one his life, would that be morally feasible? What if that life is given willingly? What if you were asked to shoulder this duty, to take a bullet in service to your country, so that others may live in freedom once more, would you?

end result

With this as a framework, look again. What do you see?

I have seen a man become untouchable for a job still waiting to be done. It is akin to what Putin demanded of Zelenski: surrender, or die. And the eastern front slow grind, is a terrible operation to watch,while the situations becomes more and more critical and desperate.

On a different level, if you would want to imbue your constituency with vigor, with vril, virility, life force [Sanskiet: aner], and this goes beyond animation, to make man what man is: manly: full of life! then there was no better stage to perform at. No q post, no rally could have done what this has done.

Going back to the egregoire. This event means that instead of cowering, looking for cover, remaining in the foxhole, there is now another idea that is being fueled.

And all the messaging surround this event, all call for a showing of humanity, not by dead beating the life force, but by transforming it, redirecting it.

Thanks for your time and attention.