The leading theory is some kind of planned demolition. I would advise people to not fall into the planes/no-planes debate (it's a red herring), but focus on the collapse of WTC1, WTC2, & especially WTC7. These are all suspicious because of WTC7 being the smoking gun for the leading theory.
If anyone wants to focus on planes.. the focus should be on how little energy they contained, which is far less than what would have been required to bring WTC1/2 down to rubble to the very base floor as we saw.
Yeah debating the no plane theory is just a dead end, the relevant facts are that the buildings were CLEARLY professionally demolished and the planes had nothing to do with the collapses.
I wouldn't be surprised at all to find there were no planes but it's not necessary for waking normies.
The collapses are where the focus should be for us
The leading theory is some kind of planned demolition. I would advise people to not fall into the planes/no-planes debate (it's a red herring), but focus on the collapse of WTC1, WTC2, & especially WTC7. These are all suspicious because of WTC7 being the smoking gun for the leading theory.
If anyone wants to focus on planes.. the focus should be on how little energy they contained, which is far less than what would have been required to bring WTC1/2 down to rubble to the very base floor as we saw.
Yeah debating the no plane theory is just a dead end, the relevant facts are that the buildings were CLEARLY professionally demolished and the planes had nothing to do with the collapses.
I wouldn't be surprised at all to find there were no planes but it's not necessary for waking normies.
The collapses are where the focus should be for us