Would anyone be interested in learning how to make better arguments in support of Q?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I believe it could really help in convincing normies.
To clarify, I'm not trying to criticize anyone or present myself as a great debater. I just see a need and believe this is the best way I can contribute to the group.
Objective: To help other Anons improve their arguments, which could assist in persuading skeptics.
How:
- Identify common logical fallacies and explain how to avoid them.
- Provide practice opportunities by role-playing as a skeptical normie.
Please let me know if you're interested and feel free to contribute your own tips and insights that you believe can help the community.
yes!
even just a weekly post here on GAW with an easily searchable title would be great for this topic.
we could all stand to improve. i think we've all made those fallible arguments that end up undermining our position, or shared graphics that could have been more clear, or made other avoidable mistakes that have cost us allies. it's always a great loss to both us and the people we are trying to lead to the truth.
knowing the truth is one thing, but sharing it with others is definitely a whole other concept.
some of what i need to work on is just discipline to not use lazy arguments, but i'm sure there are strategies i haven't even considered. definitely would love to see more discussion around this on GAW.
Awesome! I'm so glad that you see what I'm seeing.
I like your idea about a weekly post. It could be something that's coming up in current events, or something that sticks out in conversations here that could be used as examples.
hey, whatever you want your lesson plan to look like. you're the one taking the initiative