Potential Grand Unifying Theory of Physics has been released, key takeaways in comments - The Great Awakening

Potential Grand Unifying Theory of Physics has been released, key takeaways in comments (www.sciencedirect.com) 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔

posted 81 days ago by Lupinate 81 days ago by Lupinate +38 / -0

22 comments

22 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (22)

sorted by:

▲ 9 ▼

– Lupinate [S] 9 points 81 days ago +9 / -0

For non science folks, the paper seeks to create a simplified equation, which

handles both theoretical issues and multiple observational anomalies in physics.
Reduces the complexity of existing models from 10 constants down to 2 (well 3 tbh as c, speed of light, is in the mix for defining planck constants), creating a form of what might be seen as quantum coordinate geometry (spacial, temporal)
Multiple instances of this equation appears (and my math capability definitively and totally breaks down here to have a hope of proving this is the case) to derive the existing, more complex equations we have to describe quantum processes.
It proposes changes to our relative understanding of the universe in terms of mass and charge at the particle level. This is where shit gets really fucking wierd:

An electron's charge and mass are NOT CONSTANT. As the universe expands, both decrease. This is breaking my fragile little mind as it makes sense but doesn't at the same time.
Because this is the case for electrons, it is also the case for quarks, which would mean in effect all mass measurements are no longer a constant
mass is now relative to the space it is measured in, be it a local solar system, a galaxy, or the universe as a whole. This makes the universe vastly harder to comprehend conceptually as it seriously messes with the head to think this could be true.

At that point my brain fried. If (and it is a big if) this equation is true, the sciences of Physics and chemistry at minimum will be undergoing a paradigm shift similar to this time 100 years ago. It will revolutionise the understanding we hold of reality.

It will change basically all the things with the standard model (which tbf is now badly broken), and make the field of geometry at least to a degree integral to our understanding of the universe. It also means that quantum mechanics (which aligns for me to how God does anything anywhere and everywhere) is most definitely usable to describe the macro as well as the micro.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– Baffled 5 points 81 days ago +5 / -0

Excellent. Thanks for the summary. I knew the Standard Model (and therefore string theory and quantum field theory) had serious problems and was all "broken".

The integration of geometry into the mix is surprising... very mind-bending stuff. Variable mass, relative to its position in spacetime, decreasing as the Universe expands. Variable MASS???

I wonder how any of this can be verified experimentally...

Edit: very interesting coincidence with the release of the MH370 story, which shows the flight being "orb-ed" to some other location

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79R77zt6JkU&t=1547s

The technology shown requires the unification of quantum theory and the theory of relativity... where the very small affects the very large, etc.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– SwampRangers 3 points 81 days ago +3 / -0

Thanks u/Lupinate for linking the article itself and not the puffy sci-fi blurbs now being written about it!

The abstract is very promising! The authors have the right way to go and may have hit upon the right math too. It passed peer review at least, though that doesn't mean much.

Quick skim shows that it's not that deep, which means some results might be less significant, but it might well have enough staying power to build upon. I like e.g. the "fine-structure variable". However, I gather that their explanation of the JWST rapidly formed galaxies is via entangling them with later galaxies, which would be the wrong path if I'm reading that intent; so that's a yellow flag. Will need to do a deep dive with it some other time.

What happens next is that the paper's attempt to describe a handful of (about 18) effects in a different way from the Standard Model will be met by a hundred attempts to state effects that are allegedly not explained. This war will be popcorn-worthy.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q