Like u/jhartz39 said, but I know your type - pretending you're objective when you're really a propagandist.
They like to say "there were no explosions heard" when WTC1 and WTC2 fell, yet first responders consistently testified to explosions being heard.
They also like to gaslight first responders testimony of what they heard, when these first responders have heard many explosions in their careers.
Their cognitive dissonance gets in the way: acknowledging the explosives would suggest that the collapses were not solely caused by the impacts of the planes and the resulting fires as they were told to propagandize.
Or maybe they're part of a broader effort to control the narrative, discredit dissenting voices, and maintain a specific version of events that aligns with the MSM/NIST explanation of the 9/11 attacks.
Yes, I agree, I have seen it many times. I have often wondered who is paying these shills to infiltrate online conversations to confirm the MSM/NIST narrative while they belittle people looking for the truth.
Could it be members of the media who were accomplices in covering up the crime? Is it people who planned the attack? Perhaps Israeli art students? Perhaps it is Dick or Liz Cheyne themselves, lol.
It has been 20 years since it happened and they are still scared the truth will come out
They are fighting a battle they will surely lose, u/eagledriver said the real story is coming out and I agree. With sites like GAW, Twitter, Truth Social the truth is no longer censored. I try to spread truth nuggets in MSM comment threads and it is immediately removed. Irregardless, we are having considerable success in spreading the truth.
Aprox 15 years ago I was talking to my brother about all the circumstancial evidence surrounding 9/11, he thought I was crazy to believe it was a false flag event. Today, he is telling me things he learned about 9/11, the truth has arrived, it just took more convincing.
The lateral ejections on WTC1 & WTC2 were so obviously explosions
Like u/jhartz39 said, but I know your type - pretending you're objective when you're really a propagandist.
They like to say "there were no explosions heard" when WTC1 and WTC2 fell, yet first responders consistently testified to explosions being heard.
They also like to gaslight first responders testimony of what they heard, when these first responders have heard many explosions in their careers.
Their cognitive dissonance gets in the way: acknowledging the explosives would suggest that the collapses were not solely caused by the impacts of the planes and the resulting fires as they were told to propagandize.
Or maybe they're part of a broader effort to control the narrative, discredit dissenting voices, and maintain a specific version of events that aligns with the MSM/NIST explanation of the 9/11 attacks.
Yes, I agree, I have seen it many times. I have often wondered who is paying these shills to infiltrate online conversations to confirm the MSM/NIST narrative while they belittle people looking for the truth.
Could it be members of the media who were accomplices in covering up the crime? Is it people who planned the attack? Perhaps Israeli art students? Perhaps it is Dick or Liz Cheyne themselves, lol.
It has been 20 years since it happened and they are still scared the truth will come out
They are fighting a battle they will surely lose, u/eagledriver said the real story is coming out and I agree. With sites like GAW, Twitter, Truth Social the truth is no longer censored. I try to spread truth nuggets in MSM comment threads and it is immediately removed. Irregardless, we are having considerable success in spreading the truth.
Aprox 15 years ago I was talking to my brother about all the circumstancial evidence surrounding 9/11, he thought I was crazy to believe it was a false flag event. Today, he is telling me things he learned about 9/11, the truth has arrived, it just took more convincing.