Trump is the CIC of the military to keep WWIII from happening and have the military run the covert operation. The enemy took over the government. There are two primary ways to handle that situation. Trump (along with the strategists) chose to do a sting and a covert war with very limited civilian casualties. The other way would have been very temporary and cause a civil war. The way the Trump team picked fixes the big picture permanently (hopefully).
So if Trump is in control of the military, does that mean he's responsible for what happened with the withdrawal from Afghanistan? Or the military aid that was given to Ukraine?
The way I see it is the gov has some control of the military, probably most of the army and the WH control the real branches like the marines and Air Force. They could hold a percentage of each branch, I look at it as public safety and the police if that makes sense.
Trump is the CIC of the military to keep WWIII from happening and have the military run the covert operation. The enemy took over the government. There are two primary ways to handle that situation. Trump (along with the strategists) chose to do a sting and a covert war with very limited civilian casualties. The other way would have been very temporary and cause a civil war. The way the Trump team picked fixes the big picture permanently (hopefully).
THIS! ☝️ Perfectly said dude! 👏
Is this something that you've figured out for yourself, or is it something you've learned from someone else.
I'm curious as to what has happened to lead you, or others, to determine that this is what happened.
A wide range of confirming intel, including boots on the ground.
I would really love to read some of it. Could you post some links of anything you think is particularly noteworthy?
You can read about devolution and continuity of government from many sources. But that is not where I got my intel from.
So if Trump is in control of the military, does that mean he's responsible for what happened with the withdrawal from Afghanistan? Or the military aid that was given to Ukraine?
Nope. One is just Congressional funding. For the other: interference on that level would have tipped the whole hand off.
The way I see it is the gov has some control of the military, probably most of the army and the WH control the real branches like the marines and Air Force. They could hold a percentage of each branch, I look at it as public safety and the police if that makes sense.