I disagree. Politicians spout this nonsense before elections to get voters from as many groups as possible, but there has been no successful nation in the past made up of diverse groups of different backgrounds. The "melting pot" is a lie, started by a play by that name written by a Zionist, Israel Zangwill: https://old.bitchute.com/video/eByNhRgfTSOf/
The goal is to make a nation fracture itself from within because of infighting and different groups jockeying for power. Zionists openly laugh about this, and how ignorant we are.
Edit: I just identified the source of the Frank Sinatra clip. It's from a 10-minute film by the name of "The House I Live In," written by Albert Maltz, obviously a jew with an agenda.
Nationalism in the European sense involves an element of race/language: the French by race are a "nation", the English by race are a "nation", the Poles by race are a "nation" etc. Nationalism in Europe generally means expanding the boundaries of your political entity to encompass all "your people".
In the United States of America, that was deliberately downplayed to extinction. In the USA (and to a lesser degree in all of the Americas) it was the deliberate choice to live under a certain political system that made "the nation". The melting pot idea, where you leave whatever culture you came from to be part of the USA, goes right back to the founding.
There's a massive difference between different nations of a white European culture, and an arab, Asian, or African culture. Immigration into the U.S. was tightly controlled until the Hart-Cellar Act of 1965: https://immigrationhistory.org/item/hart-celler-act/ The Hart-Cellar Act completely wiped out the severe quotas on admissions from other countries detailed in the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act.
Subsequent rule changes since 1965 have made a mockery of what the original founders intended for immigration. Of note: most of the politicians pushing the changes in immigration were/are all jews. Now, it doesn't even matter, because AIPAC controls nearly every member of Congress.
From the Hart-Cellar link: "...the new law affected immigration from the Third World differently-creating greater opportunities for migration from Asia and Africa but severely restricting it from Mexico, the Caribbean, and Latin America…”
I disagree. Politicians spout this nonsense before elections to get voters from as many groups as possible, but there has been no successful nation in the past made up of diverse groups of different backgrounds. The "melting pot" is a lie, started by a play by that name written by a Zionist, Israel Zangwill: https://old.bitchute.com/video/eByNhRgfTSOf/
The goal is to make a nation fracture itself from within because of infighting and different groups jockeying for power. Zionists openly laugh about this, and how ignorant we are.
Edit: I just identified the source of the Frank Sinatra clip. It's from a 10-minute film by the name of "The House I Live In," written by Albert Maltz, obviously a jew with an agenda.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037792/
Nationalism in the European sense involves an element of race/language: the French by race are a "nation", the English by race are a "nation", the Poles by race are a "nation" etc. Nationalism in Europe generally means expanding the boundaries of your political entity to encompass all "your people".
In the United States of America, that was deliberately downplayed to extinction. In the USA (and to a lesser degree in all of the Americas) it was the deliberate choice to live under a certain political system that made "the nation". The melting pot idea, where you leave whatever culture you came from to be part of the USA, goes right back to the founding.
There's a massive difference between different nations of a white European culture, and an arab, Asian, or African culture. Immigration into the U.S. was tightly controlled until the Hart-Cellar Act of 1965: https://immigrationhistory.org/item/hart-celler-act/ The Hart-Cellar Act completely wiped out the severe quotas on admissions from other countries detailed in the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act.
Subsequent rule changes since 1965 have made a mockery of what the original founders intended for immigration. Of note: most of the politicians pushing the changes in immigration were/are all jews. Now, it doesn't even matter, because AIPAC controls nearly every member of Congress.
From the Hart-Cellar link: "...the new law affected immigration from the Third World differently-creating greater opportunities for migration from Asia and Africa but severely restricting it from Mexico, the Caribbean, and Latin America…”
It always had to be that way, here.
Not enough sovereignty minded people in any individual tribe to stand.
WWG1WGA
Good Shepherd vs Adversarial Shepherd for the minds of the sheep, and we are his hands and feet.